Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Fuel Consumption, Driver Identification, and Behavior Prediction

Drivers can be identified through patterns in their routine driving behaviours, as observed by analysing the timing and sequence of various manoeuvres. In contemporary mobility contexts, comprehending and accurately predicting drivers’ behaviours are crucial for informing efficient transportation planning, enhancing traffic safety, reducing emissions, and improving driving efficiency. An increasing number of researchers have explored a variety of machine learning (ML) models to identify, classify, and predict drivers’ behaviours. However, the reliability of these results is often undermined by the complexities associated with the data characteristics, contexts, and the authors’ expertise. Additionally, there is a lack of comprehensive investigation into the effect of driving behaviour on vehicles’ performance, driver identity, and driving activities. This research aims to compare various ML methods to establish a conclusive and generalisable empirical benchmark. The experiments were divided into three phases: estimation of fuel consumption, driver identification, and driver actions’ prediction from drivers’ behaviour during motion. The experiments evaluate prediction accuracy, performance, and computational cost using a different range of temporal and nontemporal ML models and eight datasets from diverse sources, which resulted in 9 tables of outputs. The results have been gauged and scored precisely, and then high-rated and ineffective algorithms were pinpointed for each task. This study is the most in-depth investigation, providing an exhaustive comparison of different ML models for predicting three main criteria of driving behaviour, marking it as the most detailed investigation in this field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2024.3474745
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Vehicle emissions and performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Fuel Consumption, Driver Identification, and Behavior Prediction

Reza Khoshkangini, Son N. Tran, Lawrence Sambrooks, Muhammad Bilal Amin et al.
4 citations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Vehicle emissions and performance
0.81
article

Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Fuel Consumption, Driver Identification, and Behavior Prediction

Reza Khoshkangini, Son N. Tran, Lawrence Sambrooks, Muhammad Bilal Amin, Jamal Maktoubian, Anna Shillabeer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Drivers can be identified through patterns in their routine driving behaviours, as observed by analysing the timing and sequence of various manoeuvres. In contemporary mobility contexts, comprehending and accurately predicting drivers’ behaviours are crucial for informing efficient transportation planning, enhancing traffic safety, reducing emissions, and improving driving efficiency. An increasing number of researchers have explored a variety of machine learning (ML) models to identify, classify, and predict drivers’ behaviours. However, the reliability of these results is often undermined by the complexities associated with the data characteristics, contexts, and the authors’ expertise. Additionally, there is a lack of comprehensive investigation into the effect of driving behaviour on vehicles’ performance, driver identity, and driving activities. This research aims to compare various ML methods to establish a conclusive and generalisable empirical benchmark. The experiments were divided into three phases: estimation of fuel consumption, driver identification, and driver actions’ prediction from drivers’ behaviour during motion. The experiments evaluate prediction accuracy, performance, and computational cost using a different range of temporal and nontemporal ML models and eight datasets from diverse sources, which resulted in 9 tables of outputs. The results have been gauged and scored precisely, and then high-rated and ineffective algorithms were pinpointed for each task. This study is the most in-depth investigation, providing an exhaustive comparison of different ML models for predicting three main criteria of driving behaviour, marking it as the most detailed investigation in this field.

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsVol. 25(12)
University of Tasmania (AU), Deakin University (AU), Charles Sturt University (AU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Vehicle emissions and performance
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.