Comparison of out-of-plane displacement prediction of infill masonries using artificial intelligence techniques

In the current paper, the aim is to compare the out-of-plane response prediction of an infill wall using artificial intelligence techniques. The out-of-plane response is considered displacement. To predict out-of-plane responses, artificial neural networks and extreme learning machines were used. To generate the database, two shake table experiment results were considered. R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>, mean square error, and mean absolute percentage error were used as quality metrics. The results showed that, despite the artificial neural network’s predicted score being nearly the same as the extreme learning machine’s R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>, the extreme learning machine outperformed artificial neural networks in output prediction based on the remaining quality metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/idap64064.2024.10710910
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of out-of-plane displacement prediction of infill masonries using artificial intelligence techniques

Onur Onat
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

Comparison of out-of-plane displacement prediction of infill masonries using artificial intelligence techniques

Onur Onat
article en

Abstract

In the current paper, the aim is to compare the out-of-plane response prediction of an infill wall using artificial intelligence techniques. The out-of-plane response is considered displacement. To predict out-of-plane responses, artificial neural networks and extreme learning machines were used. To generate the database, two shake table experiment results were considered. R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>, mean square error, and mean absolute percentage error were used as quality metrics. The results showed that, despite the artificial neural network’s predicted score being nearly the same as the extreme learning machine’s R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>, the extreme learning machine outperformed artificial neural networks in output prediction based on the remaining quality metrics.

Vol. 21
Inonu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.