Identification of Learning Styles of Undergraduate Physiotherapy Male and Female Students

A bstract Background: The concept of learning styles pertains to the different ways in which individuals organize and interpret information. Numerous factors influence an individual’s learning style. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the most popular learning styles of male and female physiotherapy students. Materials and Methods: A total of 181 participants were selected via a stratified random sampling method based on specific inclusion criteria. Of these, 71 were male and 110 were females. The VARK learning style questionnaire was employed to assess their learning styles, and the data were analyzed using statistical variables such as mean and percentage. Results: The results indicated that 91.5% of male participants preferred bimodal learning styles, with the most popular learning style among them being kinesthetic, chosen by 53.8%. Among female participants, 83.6% preferred unimodal learning styles, while 7.27% preferred bimodal learning styles. Their most favored learning style was also kinesthetic, chosen by 61.38% of female participants. Conclusion: The study identified that both male and female physiotherapy students mostly preferred the kinesthetic learning styles, thereby indicating a similarity in learning styles between them. These findings could be useful for educators in the field of physiotherapy by helping them design learning materials that cater to the most popular learning styles of their students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Society of Indian Physiotherapists
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jsip.jsip_9_24
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Learning Styles of Undergraduate Physiotherapy Male and Female Students

Vinay Jagga, Jyoti Rani
Journal of Society of Indian Physiotherapists
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

Identification of Learning Styles of Undergraduate Physiotherapy Male and Female Students

Vinay Jagga, Jyoti Rani
article en

Abstract

A bstract Background: The concept of learning styles pertains to the different ways in which individuals organize and interpret information. Numerous factors influence an individual’s learning style. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the most popular learning styles of male and female physiotherapy students. Materials and Methods: A total of 181 participants were selected via a stratified random sampling method based on specific inclusion criteria. Of these, 71 were male and 110 were females. The VARK learning style questionnaire was employed to assess their learning styles, and the data were analyzed using statistical variables such as mean and percentage. Results: The results indicated that 91.5% of male participants preferred bimodal learning styles, with the most popular learning style among them being kinesthetic, chosen by 53.8%. Among female participants, 83.6% preferred unimodal learning styles, while 7.27% preferred bimodal learning styles. Their most favored learning style was also kinesthetic, chosen by 61.38% of female participants. Conclusion: The study identified that both male and female physiotherapy students mostly preferred the kinesthetic learning styles, thereby indicating a similarity in learning styles between them. These findings could be useful for educators in the field of physiotherapy by helping them design learning materials that cater to the most popular learning styles of their students.

Journal of Society of Indian PhysiotherapistsVol. 9(1)
Baba Mastnath University (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.