Performance of the Washington Group questions in measuring blindness and deafness

The Washington Group Short Set (WGSS) questions are intended to measure the severity of disability and disability status in US federal surveys. We used data from the 2010-2018 National Health Interview Survey to examine the performance of the WGSS visual disability and hearing disability questions in capturing blindness and deafness. We found that the WGSS questions failed to capture 35.7% of blind adults and 43.7% of deaf respondents as having a severe disability, or, per their recommended cut point, as being disabled. Coupled with evidence demonstrating the poor performance of the WGSS questions in estimating the size of the overall disability population, we contend that results from this study necessitate a halt in the use of the WGSS questions to measure disability in US federal surveys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae131
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of the Washington Group questions in measuring blindness and deafness

Jean P. Hall, Scott D. Landes, Bonnielin K. Swenor
6 citations
Health Affairs Scholar
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
6.79
article

Performance of the Washington Group questions in measuring blindness and deafness

Jean P. Hall, Scott D. Landes, Bonnielin K. Swenor
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The Washington Group Short Set (WGSS) questions are intended to measure the severity of disability and disability status in US federal surveys. We used data from the 2010-2018 National Health Interview Survey to examine the performance of the WGSS visual disability and hearing disability questions in capturing blindness and deafness. We found that the WGSS questions failed to capture 35.7% of blind adults and 43.7% of deaf respondents as having a severe disability, or, per their recommended cut point, as being disabled. Coupled with evidence demonstrating the poor performance of the WGSS questions in estimating the size of the overall disability population, we contend that results from this study necessitate a halt in the use of the WGSS questions to measure disability in US federal surveys.

Health Affairs ScholarVol. 2(11)
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Kansas (US), Center for Independent Living (US), Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
6.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance of the Washington Group questions in measuring blindness and deafness — Jean P. Hall, Scott D. Landes, et al. · Health Affairs Scholar (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS