Cybersecurity risks of automated (and autonomous) offshore oil and gas units—the IMO cybersecurity rules framework

Abstract Automated and/or autonomous offshore platforms or units are becoming more important in the energy sector, whether they are being used for oil and gas extraction or for carbon storage purposes. Automation means that harsh working conditions and risks of personal injury to crew could be cut to virtually zero. Automation also provides significant cost savings and helps make less attractive oil and gas fields more economically viable to exploit. However, automation does come with its own set of challenges—the notable one being the cybersecurity threat. Any regulation or international standard dealing with the cybersecurity risk which is relevant to automated offshore units is usually framed within those rules that apply to ships. This article examines to what extent that regulatory approach, especially that of the International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO) regime, could and should apply to automated or autonomous offshore platforms. It argues that whilst, for now, the IMO cybersecurity guidelines are relevant, a more targeted regulatory approach is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of World Energy Law & Business
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwae020
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cybersecurity risks of automated (and autonomous) offshore oil and gas units—the IMO cybersecurity rules framework

Juei-Cheng Jao, Jason Chuah
The Journal of World Energy Law & Business
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Cybersecurity risks of automated (and autonomous) offshore oil and gas units—the IMO cybersecurity rules framework

Juei-Cheng Jao, Jason Chuah
article en

Abstract

Abstract Automated and/or autonomous offshore platforms or units are becoming more important in the energy sector, whether they are being used for oil and gas extraction or for carbon storage purposes. Automation means that harsh working conditions and risks of personal injury to crew could be cut to virtually zero. Automation also provides significant cost savings and helps make less attractive oil and gas fields more economically viable to exploit. However, automation does come with its own set of challenges—the notable one being the cybersecurity threat. Any regulation or international standard dealing with the cybersecurity risk which is relevant to automated offshore units is usually framed within those rules that apply to ships. This article examines to what extent that regulatory approach, especially that of the International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO) regime, could and should apply to automated or autonomous offshore platforms. It argues that whilst, for now, the IMO cybersecurity guidelines are relevant, a more targeted regulatory approach is needed.

The Journal of World Energy Law & BusinessVol. 17(6)
University of London (GB), National Taiwan Ocean University (TW), GTx (United States) (US), University of Malaya (MY)
Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cybersecurity risks of automated (and autonomous) offshore oil and gas units—the IMO cybersecurity rules framework — Juei-Cheng Jao, Jason Chuah · The Journal of World Energy Law & Business (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS