Advance Consent for Participation in Acute Stroke Trials: A Focus Group Study with People with Lived Experience of Stroke

Advance consent could address many of the limitations traditional consenting methods pose to participation in acute stroke trials. We conducted a series of five focus groups with people with lived experience of stroke. Using an inductive thematic approach, two themes were developed: factors in favour of, and against, advance consent. Participants supported the idea of advance consent and highlighted trust, transparent communication and sufficient time as major factors that would positively affect their decision to provide advance consent. The results will be used to finalise a model of advance consent suitable for testing the feasibility in stroke prevention clinics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.302
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advance Consent for Participation in Acute Stroke Trials: A Focus Group Study with People with Lived Experience of Stroke

Rena Seeger, Brian Dewar, Dar Dowlatshahi, Michel Christopher Frank Shamy et al.
2 citations
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
1.70
article

Advance Consent for Participation in Acute Stroke Trials: A Focus Group Study with People with Lived Experience of Stroke

Rena Seeger, Brian Dewar, Dar Dowlatshahi, Michel Christopher Frank Shamy, Mark Fedyk, Ubong Udoh, Sophia Gocan, Stuart G. Nicholls, Victoria Shepherd, Emma Cummings
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Advance consent could address many of the limitations traditional consenting methods pose to participation in acute stroke trials. We conducted a series of five focus groups with people with lived experience of stroke. Using an inductive thematic approach, two themes were developed: factors in favour of, and against, advance consent. Participants supported the idea of advance consent and highlighted trust, transparent communication and sufficient time as major factors that would positively affect their decision to provide advance consent. The results will be used to finalise a model of advance consent suitable for testing the feasibility in stroke prevention clinics.

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesVol. 52(3)
Ottawa Hospital (CA), University of California System (US), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), Cardiff University (GB), University of California, Davis (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advance Consent for Participation in Acute Stroke Trials: A Focus Group Study with People with Lived Experience of Stroke — Rena Seeger, Brian Dewar, et al. · Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS