Drug–Drug Interaction Between Dihydroartemisinin–Piperaquine and Sulfadoxine‐Pyrimethamine During Malaria Chemoprevention in Pregnant Women

Co-administration of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) may be superior in preventing adverse birth outcomes compared with either therapy alone, but potential drug-drug interactions require investigation. We conducted intensive and sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in a subset of Ugandan women participating in a randomized controlled trial of monthly IPTp with SP vs. DP vs. DP + SP. Intensive PK sampling was performed from day 0 to 23 after dosing at 28 weeks gestation in 87 participants across treatment arms. Sparse sampling was performed on day 28 (trough) after dosing at 20 and 28 gestational weeks in additional 196 participants receiving SP vs. DP + SP. Intensive PK analysis demonstrated that compared with SP alone, co-administration of DP + SP was associated with lower maximal concentrations, the area under the concentration-time curves (AUC), and day 23 concentrations of sulfadoxine (25%, 25%, and 27%) and pyrimethamine (26%, 34%, and 32%) (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Sparse PK results demonstrated participants co-administered DP + SP had lower trough concentrations after dosing at 20 and 28 gestational weeks for sulfadoxine (6%, P = 0.68 and 31%, P = 0.023, respectively) and pyrimethamine (18%, P = 0.032 and 33%, P < 0.001, respectively) compared with SP alone. Co-administration of DP + SP was associated with a 19% reduction in piperaquine AUC (P = 0.046), but no significant difference in other PK parameters compared with DP alone. In summary, co-administration of DP + SP was associated with significantly reduced SP exposure, with a greater magnitude during the third vs. second trimester. The clinical consequences of this interaction are yet unknown.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3471
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drug–Drug Interaction Between Dihydroartemisinin–Piperaquine and Sulfadoxine‐Pyrimethamine During Malaria Chemoprevention in Pregnant Women

Moses W. Mwima, Michelle E. Roh, Francesca Aweeka, David Gingrich et al.
7 citations
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Malaria Research and Control
3.80
article

Drug–Drug Interaction Between Dihydroartemisinin–Piperaquine and Sulfadoxine‐Pyrimethamine During Malaria Chemoprevention in Pregnant Women

Moses W. Mwima, Michelle E. Roh, Francesca Aweeka, David Gingrich, Abel Kakuru, Harriet Adrama, Norah Mwebaza, Yi Geng, Bishop Opira, Nikoletta Fotaki, Kevin Guo, Liusheng Huang, Philip J. Rosenthal, Moses Robert Kamya, Florence Marzan, Jimmy Kizza, Miriam Aguti, Grant Dorsey, Leonard Opio, Timothy Ssemukuye
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Co-administration of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) may be superior in preventing adverse birth outcomes compared with either therapy alone, but potential drug-drug interactions require investigation. We conducted intensive and sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in a subset of Ugandan women participating in a randomized controlled trial of monthly IPTp with SP vs. DP vs. DP + SP. Intensive PK sampling was performed from day 0 to 23 after dosing at 28 weeks gestation in 87 participants across treatment arms. Sparse sampling was performed on day 28 (trough) after dosing at 20 and 28 gestational weeks in additional 196 participants receiving SP vs. DP + SP. Intensive PK analysis demonstrated that compared with SP alone, co-administration of DP + SP was associated with lower maximal concentrations, the area under the concentration-time curves (AUC), and day 23 concentrations of sulfadoxine (25%, 25%, and 27%) and pyrimethamine (26%, 34%, and 32%) (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Sparse PK results demonstrated participants co-administered DP + SP had lower trough concentrations after dosing at 20 and 28 gestational weeks for sulfadoxine (6%, P = 0.68 and 31%, P = 0.023, respectively) and pyrimethamine (18%, P = 0.032 and 33%, P < 0.001, respectively) compared with SP alone. Co-administration of DP + SP was associated with a 19% reduction in piperaquine AUC (P = 0.046), but no significant difference in other PK parameters compared with DP alone. In summary, co-administration of DP + SP was associated with significantly reduced SP exposure, with a greater magnitude during the third vs. second trimester. The clinical consequences of this interaction are yet unknown.

Clinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsVol. 117(2)
San Francisco General Hospital (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration (UG), Zero to Three (US), Global Brain Health Institute (US), University of Bath (GB), Makerere University (UG)
National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Malaria Research and Control
3.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.