Room acoustic survey of open and enclosed learning spaces in Finland

Use of open learning spaces for education has increased in schools while enclosed learning spaces are still used in most schools in overall. There is some debate that these two learning space types might differ in acoustic perceptions. If they do, room acoustic quality might be one explaining factor. Therefore, our purpose was to determine, whether these learning space types differ in room acoustic properties. We studied 10 schools with mostly enclosed and another 10 schools with open or flexible learning spaces in Finland. Altogether 73 learning spaces were investigated among the 20 schools. Measurements concerned reverberation time, Speech Transmission Index, and background noise level. Most of enclosed learning spaces (63%) met the new requirements of Finnish building regulations for enclosed learning spaces. Opposite to that, most of open learning spaces (91%) did not meet the regulations for open learning spaces. The results can be used in the root cause analysis of a teacher survey conducted in the same 20 schools. Teacher survey will be reported in another study. Parallel analysis of objective and subjective results is necessary to judge whether the current regulations are justified.