Responsible Crowdsourcing for Responsible Generative AI: Engaging Crowds in AI Auditing and Evaluation

With the rise of generative AI (GenAI), there has been an increased need for participation by large and diverse user bases in AI evaluation and auditing. GenAI developers are increasingly adopting crowdsourcing approaches to test and audit their AI products and services. However, it remains an open question how to design and deploy responsible and effective crowdsourcing pipelines for AI auditing and evaluation. This workshop aims to take a step towards bridging this gap. Our interdisciplinary team of organizers will work with workshop participants to explore several key questions, such as how to improve the output quality and workers' productivity for GenAI evaluation crowdsourcing tasks compared to discriminative AI systems, how to guide crowds in auditing problematic AI-generated content while managing their psychological impact, ensuring marginalized voices are heard, and setting up responsible and effective crowdsourcing pipelines for real-world GenAI evaluation. We hope this workshop will produce a research agenda and best practices for designing responsible crowd-based approaches to AI auditing and evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v12i1.31609
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsible Crowdsourcing for Responsible Generative AI: Engaging Crowds in AI Auditing and Evaluation

Mark Díaz, Kenneth Holstein, Lara Groves, Motahhare Eslami et al.
3 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.58
article

Responsible Crowdsourcing for Responsible Generative AI: Engaging Crowds in AI Auditing and Evaluation

Mark Díaz, Kenneth Holstein, Lara Groves, Motahhare Eslami, Wesley Hanwen Deng, Jina Suh, Nick Judd, Mireia Yurrita, Hong Shen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

With the rise of generative AI (GenAI), there has been an increased need for participation by large and diverse user bases in AI evaluation and auditing. GenAI developers are increasingly adopting crowdsourcing approaches to test and audit their AI products and services. However, it remains an open question how to design and deploy responsible and effective crowdsourcing pipelines for AI auditing and evaluation. This workshop aims to take a step towards bridging this gap. Our interdisciplinary team of organizers will work with workshop participants to explore several key questions, such as how to improve the output quality and workers' productivity for GenAI evaluation crowdsourcing tasks compared to discriminative AI systems, how to guide crowds in auditing problematic AI-generated content while managing their psychological impact, ensuring marginalized voices are heard, and setting up responsible and effective crowdsourcing pipelines for real-world GenAI evaluation. We hope this workshop will produce a research agenda and best practices for designing responsible crowd-based approaches to AI auditing and evaluation.

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and CrowdsourcingVol. 12
Google (United States) (US), Digital Science (United States) (US), Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB), Lovelace Clinic Foundation Research (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.