What Does It Mean to “Misuse” Research Data?

ABSTRACT In this panel, we will discuss how “data misuse” is understood across different disciplines, and in particular digital curation, critical data studies, scholarly communication, and algorithmic fairness. The audience will be invited to contribute to the discussion by reporting on their own experience with data misuse, and brainstorming potential interventions to prevent misuse. Controversial reuses of open research data are emerging, including exploitation of marginalized communities, geo privacy violations, and perpetuation of harmful stereotypes. Incidents of data misuse hinder scientific progress and erode public trust, yet defining misuse remains challenging as one community's misuse might be another's best practice. The development of a shared framework to understand when, how, and why misuse of research data occurs can help science stakeholders decide when and how to release crucial research data, evaluate the potential for misuse, and tailor documentation of research data to prevent misuse. Our goal for this panel discussion is to take us a step closer to the development of such a theoretical framework for defining data misuse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1108
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Does It Mean to “Misuse” Research Data?

Andrea K. Thomer, Amelia Acker, Irene V. Pasquetto, Meera Desai et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
article

What Does It Mean to “Misuse” Research Data?

Andrea K. Thomer, Amelia Acker, Irene V. Pasquetto, Meera Desai, Natascha Chtena
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this panel, we will discuss how “data misuse” is understood across different disciplines, and in particular digital curation, critical data studies, scholarly communication, and algorithmic fairness. The audience will be invited to contribute to the discussion by reporting on their own experience with data misuse, and brainstorming potential interventions to prevent misuse. Controversial reuses of open research data are emerging, including exploitation of marginalized communities, geo privacy violations, and perpetuation of harmful stereotypes. Incidents of data misuse hinder scientific progress and erode public trust, yet defining misuse remains challenging as one community's misuse might be another's best practice. The development of a shared framework to understand when, how, and why misuse of research data occurs can help science stakeholders decide when and how to release crucial research data, evaluate the potential for misuse, and tailor documentation of research data to prevent misuse. Our goal for this panel discussion is to take us a step closer to the development of such a theoretical framework for defining data misuse.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 61(1)
University of Arizona (US), Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Michigan (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.