Everyday Triangulation within Challenging Informational and Legal Contexts: Exploring Everyday Triangulation in Individuals Considering Cannabis Use during Pregnancy or Lactation

ABSTRACT Medical evidence on the risks and benefits of cannabis is limited; existing research is often inconclusive or conflicting. In the United States, cannabis use during pregnancy is stigmatized and often subject to complex legal constraints; these contextual components may have significant effects on information seeking and informed decision‐making processes. This study applies Reflexive Thematic Analysis to 23 telephone interviews with individuals considering cannabis use in pregnancy or lactation to explore their information needs; how adequately those needs were met; and how information triangulation, and other information seeking behaviours, were used to make decisions given the dearth of scientific evidence. Findings suggest that information needs are complex and contextual, and that participants used forms of triangulation that included relational and intuitive elements as well as cognitive assessment processes. A new model of Everyday Triangulation (ET) is presented to represent these complex assessment practices in a holistic manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1180
Primary Topic
Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Everyday Triangulation within Challenging Informational and Legal Contexts: Exploring Everyday Triangulation in Individuals Considering Cannabis Use during Pregnancy or Lactation

Faith English, Devon Greyson, Heather L. O'Brien, Maria Mulder
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
article

Everyday Triangulation within Challenging Informational and Legal Contexts: Exploring Everyday Triangulation in Individuals Considering Cannabis Use during Pregnancy or Lactation

Faith English, Devon Greyson, Heather L. O'Brien, Maria Mulder
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Medical evidence on the risks and benefits of cannabis is limited; existing research is often inconclusive or conflicting. In the United States, cannabis use during pregnancy is stigmatized and often subject to complex legal constraints; these contextual components may have significant effects on information seeking and informed decision‐making processes. This study applies Reflexive Thematic Analysis to 23 telephone interviews with individuals considering cannabis use in pregnancy or lactation to explore their information needs; how adequately those needs were met; and how information triangulation, and other information seeking behaviours, were used to make decisions given the dearth of scientific evidence. Findings suggest that information needs are complex and contextual, and that participants used forms of triangulation that included relational and intuitive elements as well as cognitive assessment processes. A new model of Everyday Triangulation (ET) is presented to represent these complex assessment practices in a holistic manner.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 61(1)
Health Canada (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Institute of Population and Public Health (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.