Corporate Governance in Platform Governance: Reassessing Stakeholderism in a Disruptive Era

Today, many of the largest and most successful businesses such as Google, Amazon, Apple, and Metaverse (Facebook) operate as online platforms. While they bring vast economic and societal benefits, their negative impacts on the society are increasingly causing public concerns. Despite the consensus that they must be governed, a topdown style of public regulation may not represent an optimal path to address platform ills. In this context, corporate governance that incorporates a stakeholder perspective may provide a preferable means to strengthen platform governance. While stakeholder thinking is not without its criticisms, the context of the platform society and disruptive innovation does provide a strong case for stakeholderism. The latter may therefore have the potential to bridge the topics of platform governance and corporate governance. Platform governance via corporate governance may be institutionalised along multiple lines including, inter alia, stakeholder representation on the board, directors’ fiduciary duty enforceable by stakeholders, the board’s reporting obligation in respect of platform governance, and the stewardship responsibility imposed upon institutional shareholders.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Business Law Review
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2024045
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Governance in Platform Governance: Reassessing Stakeholderism in a Disruptive Era

Qiang Cai
European Business Law Review
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Corporate Governance in Platform Governance: Reassessing Stakeholderism in a Disruptive Era

Qiang Cai
article en

Abstract

Today, many of the largest and most successful businesses such as Google, Amazon, Apple, and Metaverse (Facebook) operate as online platforms. While they bring vast economic and societal benefits, their negative impacts on the society are increasingly causing public concerns. Despite the consensus that they must be governed, a topdown style of public regulation may not represent an optimal path to address platform ills. In this context, corporate governance that incorporates a stakeholder perspective may provide a preferable means to strengthen platform governance. While stakeholder thinking is not without its criticisms, the context of the platform society and disruptive innovation does provide a strong case for stakeholderism. The latter may therefore have the potential to bridge the topics of platform governance and corporate governance. Platform governance via corporate governance may be institutionalised along multiple lines including, inter alia, stakeholder representation on the board, directors’ fiduciary duty enforceable by stakeholders, the board’s reporting obligation in respect of platform governance, and the stewardship responsibility imposed upon institutional shareholders.

European Business Law ReviewVol. 35(Issue 6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Corporate Governance in Platform Governance: Reassessing Stakeholderism in a Disruptive Era — Qiang Cai · European Business Law Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS