Volumetric analysis of maxillary sinuses for gender determination: Manual vs. 3D segmentation

The effectiveness of manual calculations versus 3D segmentation techniques in volumetric analysis of maxillary sinuses for gender determination is of interest. Maxillary sinuses, which vary anatomically due to factors like age, ethnicity, and gender, are crucial in forensic and anthropological contexts. Traditional methods, relying on two-dimensional imaging, are often time-consuming and prone to errors, whereas 3D segmentation offers a more precise and efficient approach. This research evaluates both methods in terms of reliability, accuracy, and practical use, potentially influencing their application in clinical and forensic settings. The findings may also enhance understanding of anatomical variations in maxillary sinuses across populations, contributing to more accurate gender determination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinformation
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300200882
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Volumetric analysis of maxillary sinuses for gender determination: Manual vs. 3D segmentation

Abhishek Mukherjee, Shweta Rode, Bhavika Pol Vhatkar, Naveen Shetty
1 citations
Bioinformation
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
2.92
article

Volumetric analysis of maxillary sinuses for gender determination: Manual vs. 3D segmentation

Abhishek Mukherjee, Shweta Rode, Bhavika Pol Vhatkar, Naveen Shetty
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The effectiveness of manual calculations versus 3D segmentation techniques in volumetric analysis of maxillary sinuses for gender determination is of interest. Maxillary sinuses, which vary anatomically due to factors like age, ethnicity, and gender, are crucial in forensic and anthropological contexts. Traditional methods, relying on two-dimensional imaging, are often time-consuming and prone to errors, whereas 3D segmentation offers a more precise and efficient approach. This research evaluates both methods in terms of reliability, accuracy, and practical use, potentially influencing their application in clinical and forensic settings. The findings may also enhance understanding of anatomical variations in maxillary sinuses across populations, contributing to more accurate gender determination.

BioinformationVol. 20(8)
D.Y. Patil University (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Volumetric analysis of maxillary sinuses for gender determination: Manual vs. 3D segmentation — Abhishek Mukherjee, Shweta Rode, et al. · Bioinformation (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS