Gender Differences in Operative Autonomy Using the Surgical Autonomy Program: A Multicenter Study
<b>Background</b> The proportion of women surgeons is increasing, but studies show that women in surgical residency are granted less autonomy than men. <b>Objective</b> We utilized the Surgical Autonomy Program (SAP), an educational framework, to evaluate gender differences in self-reported autonomy, attending-reported autonomy, and operative feedback among US neurosurgical residents. <b>Methods</b> The SAP tracks resident progression and guides teaching in neurosurgery. Surgeries are divided into zones of proximal development (opening, exposure, critical portion, and closure). Postoperatively, resident autonomy is rated on a 4-point scale by the resident and the attending for each part of the case, or zone. We utilized data from July 2017 to February 2024 from 8 institutions. Ordinal regression was used to evaluate the odds of self- and attending-evaluated autonomy, accounting for gender, training year, case difficulty, and institution. Differences between attending assessment and self-assessment were calculated across time. Chi-square analyses were used to measure any differences in feedback given to men and women. <b>Results</b> From 128 residents (32 women, 25%), 11894 cases were included. Women were granted less autonomy (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.74-0.89; <i>P</i><.001) and self-evaluated as having less autonomy (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.67-0.80; <i>P</i><.001). The odds of women operating at higher autonomy were similar to the odds of operating on a hard case compared to average difficulty (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.71-0.84; <i>P</i><.001). Men's and women's self-assessment became closer to attending assessment over time, with women improving more quickly for the critical portions of surgeries. Women residents received meaningful postoperative feedback on fewer cases (women: 74.2%, men: 80.5%; X<sup>2</sup>=31.929; <i>P</i><.001). <b>Conclusions</b> Women operated with lower autonomy by both attending and self-assessment, but the assessment gap between genders decreased over time. Women also received less feedback from their attendings.
Authors
- Elayna Kirsch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-2693)
- Josiah N. Orina (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8301-7104)
- Rajeev Dharmapurikar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4491-0642)
- Di Deng
- Bradley A. Dengler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3294-5431)
- Sean M. Lew (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-4998)
- Chirag G. Patil (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9068-1898)
- Katherine E. McDaniel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8046-1493)
- Chirag D. Gandhi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8423-0414)
- Michael M. Haglund (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6332-0808)
- Vishal Venkatraman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-4026)
- Ira M. Goldstein (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2443-0315)
- Shivanand P. Lad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4991-5319)
- Grahame Gould (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4579-1099)
- Alexander D. Suarez
- Howard J. Silberstein
Institutions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- Westchester Medical Center (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
- Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
- Health Net (US)
- University of Rochester Medical Center (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Duke University Hospital (US)
- Neurological Surgery (US)
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Graduate Medical Education
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-23-00682.1
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.15
Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences