Life, Death and Energy: What Does Nature Select?

Evolutionary biology is poised for a third major synthesis. The first presented Darwin's evidence from natural history. The second incorporated genetic mechanisms. The third will be based on energy and biophysical processes. It should include the equal fitness paradigm (EFP), which quantifies how organisms convert biomass into surviving offspring. Natural selection tends to maximise energetic fitness, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>coh</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mi>GFQ</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ E={P}_{\mathrm{coh}}\mathrm{GFQ} $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> , where <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>coh</mml:mi></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {P}_{\mathrm{coh}} $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> is mass-specific rate of cohort biomass production, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ G $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> is generation time, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ F $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> is fraction of cohort production that is passed to surviving offspring, and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ Q $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> is energy density of biomas. At steady state, parents replace themselves with offspring of equal mass-specific energy content, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ E $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ≈ 22.4 kJ/g, and biomass, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ M $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ≈ 1 g/g. The EFP highlights: (i) the energetic basis of survival and reproduction; (ii) how natural selection acts directly on the parameters of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ M $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ; (iii) why there is no inherent intrinsic fitness advantage for higher metabolic power, ontogenetic or population growth rate, fecundity, longevity, or resource use efficiency; and (iv) the role of energy in animals with a variety of life histories. Underlying the spectacular diversity of living things is pervasive similarity in how energy is acquired from the environment and used to leave descendants offspring in future generations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology Letters
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14517
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life, Death and Energy: What Does Nature Select?

Chen Hou, James H. Brown, Joseph R. Burger, Charles A. S. Hall
8 citations
Ecology Letters
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
4.40
article

Life, Death and Energy: What Does Nature Select?

Chen Hou, James H. Brown, Joseph R. Burger, Charles A. S. Hall
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Evolutionary biology is poised for a third major synthesis. The first presented Darwin's evidence from natural history. The second incorporated genetic mechanisms. The third will be based on energy and biophysical processes. It should include the equal fitness paradigm (EFP), which quantifies how organisms convert biomass into surviving offspring. Natural selection tends to maximise energetic fitness, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>coh</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mi>GFQ</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ E={P}_{\mathrm{coh}}\mathrm{GFQ} $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> , where <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>coh</mml:mi></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {P}_{\mathrm{coh}} $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> is mass-specific rate of cohort biomass production, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ G $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> is generation time, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ F $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> is fraction of cohort production that is passed to surviving offspring, and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ Q $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> is energy density of biomas. At steady state, parents replace themselves with offspring of equal mass-specific energy content, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ E $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ≈ 22.4 kJ/g, and biomass, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ M $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ≈ 1 g/g. The EFP highlights: (i) the energetic basis of survival and reproduction; (ii) how natural selection acts directly on the parameters of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ M $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ; (iii) why there is no inherent intrinsic fitness advantage for higher metabolic power, ontogenetic or population growth rate, fecundity, longevity, or resource use efficiency; and (iv) the role of energy in animals with a variety of life histories. Underlying the spectacular diversity of living things is pervasive similarity in how energy is acquired from the environment and used to leave descendants offspring in future generations.

Ecology LettersVol. 27(10)
State University of New York (US), University of Kentucky (US), SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US), University of New Mexico (US), Missouri University of Science and Technology (US), York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
4.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.