Why partisans feel hated: Distinct static and dynamic relationships with animosity meta-perceptions
Partisans hold inaccurate perceptions of the other side. What drives these inaccuracies? We address this question with a focus on partisan animosity meta-perceptions (i.e. how much a partisan believes opposing partisans hate them). We argue that predictors can relate to meta-perceptions statically (e.g. at a specific point in time, do partisans who post more about politics on social media differ in their meta-perceptions relative to partisans who post less?) or dynamically (e.g. does a partisan who increases their social media political posting between two defined time points change their meta-perceptions accordingly?). Using panel data from the 2020 US presidential election, we find variables display distinct static and dynamic relationships with meta-perceptions. Notably, between individuals, posting online exhibits no (static) relationship with meta-perceptions, while within individuals, those who increased their postings over time (dynamically) became more accurate. The results make clear that overly general statements about meta-perceptions and their predictors, including social media activity, are bound to be wrong. How meta-perceptions relate to other factors often depends on contextual circumstances at a given time.
Authors
- Mina Cikara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6612-4474)
- Jeffrey Martin Lees (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6030-4207)
- James Druckman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-6790)
Institutions
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Princeton University (US)
- University of Rochester (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PNAS Nexus
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae324
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Social Media and Politics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.96
Funders
- National Science Foundation