Critical thinking and misinformation vulnerability: Experimental evidence from Colombia

Misinformation represents a vital threat to the societal fabric of modern economies. While skills interventions to detect misinformation such as de-bunking and prebunking, media literacy, and manipulation resilience have begun to receive increased attention, evidence on de-biasing interventions and their link with misinformation vulnerability is scarce. We explore the demand for misinformation through the lens of augmenting critical thinking in an online framed field experiment during the 2022 Presidential election in Colombia. Data from roughly 2.000 individuals suggest that providing individuals with information about their own biases (obtained through a personality test) has no impact on skepticism towards news. But (additionally) showing participants a de-biasing video seems to enhance critical thinking, causing subjects to more carefully consider the truthfulness of potential misinformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PNAS Nexus
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae361
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical thinking and misinformation vulnerability: Experimental evidence from Colombia

Beatriz Helena Vallejo, J. Unda, Lina Marcela Ramirez, John A. List et al.
9 citations
PNAS Nexus
Misinformation and Its Impacts
10.19
article

Critical thinking and misinformation vulnerability: Experimental evidence from Colombia

Beatriz Helena Vallejo, J. Unda, Lina Marcela Ramirez, John A. List, Julia Seither
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Misinformation represents a vital threat to the societal fabric of modern economies. While skills interventions to detect misinformation such as de-bunking and prebunking, media literacy, and manipulation resilience have begun to receive increased attention, evidence on de-biasing interventions and their link with misinformation vulnerability is scarce. We explore the demand for misinformation through the lens of augmenting critical thinking in an online framed field experiment during the 2022 Presidential election in Colombia. Data from roughly 2.000 individuals suggest that providing individuals with information about their own biases (obtained through a personality test) has no impact on skepticism towards news. But (additionally) showing participants a de-biasing video seems to enhance critical thinking, causing subjects to more carefully consider the truthfulness of potential misinformation.

PNAS NexusVol. 3(10)
University of Chicago (US), Ethos (United Kingdom) (GB), Universidad del Rosario (CO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
10.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.