Detection and Localization of Radio Frequency Interference Sources

This paper extends previous research on locating Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) sources using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) by enhancing the method’s accuracy and reliability. Building on earlier work, we introduce improvements in both hardware and algorithmic processing to ensure the system remains cost-effective, easily deployable, and operable by non-experts. A heading-capable GNSS receiver processes the signal from one of the two GNSS antennas through its primary port and a combined signal from a directional antenna and the second GNSS antenna through its secondary port. To prevent a loss of the GNSS heading due to strong RFI, we integrated a Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor to provide continuous heading information. We conducted flight tests to assess the system’s performance, using a 5G antenna as the interference source. The results demonstrate the IMU’s capability to bridge periods of GNSS heading loss, maintaining a deviation of 0.3 degrees. Additionally, we evaluated two methods for determining the bearing to the RFI source: one based on the C/N0 difference between the main and auxiliary GNSS antenna, and another relying only on the auxiliary antenna’s C/N0 values. The latter method proved more accurate, with a bearing estimate off by only 2.3 degrees from the true bearing of the UAV to the 5G antenna. Using two measurements, each consisting of a 360° rotation from different locations, the estimated RFI source location was determined. However, due to similar angles of both measurements towards the RFI source, it resulted in an error margin of 18.4 meters. The study concludes with recommendations for further refining the system, such as using a GNSS receiver with independent Automatic Gain Control (AGC) for each antenna input and conducting more extensive field tests with real jammers to evaluate the method’s efficacy at varying distances. Future work will also explore manual IMU calibration techniques to enhance heading accuracy in the absence of an initial GNSS heading calibration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (Online)/Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (CD-ROM)
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33012/2024.19710
Primary Topic
Antenna Design and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection and Localization of Radio Frequency Interference Sources

Valentin Fischer, Michael Felux, Sophie Jochems
Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (Online)/Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (CD-ROM)
Antenna Design and Optimization
article

Detection and Localization of Radio Frequency Interference Sources

Valentin Fischer, Michael Felux, Sophie Jochems
article en

Abstract

This paper extends previous research on locating Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) sources using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) by enhancing the method’s accuracy and reliability. Building on earlier work, we introduce improvements in both hardware and algorithmic processing to ensure the system remains cost-effective, easily deployable, and operable by non-experts. A heading-capable GNSS receiver processes the signal from one of the two GNSS antennas through its primary port and a combined signal from a directional antenna and the second GNSS antenna through its secondary port. To prevent a loss of the GNSS heading due to strong RFI, we integrated a Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor to provide continuous heading information. We conducted flight tests to assess the system’s performance, using a 5G antenna as the interference source. The results demonstrate the IMU’s capability to bridge periods of GNSS heading loss, maintaining a deviation of 0.3 degrees. Additionally, we evaluated two methods for determining the bearing to the RFI source: one based on the C/N0 difference between the main and auxiliary GNSS antenna, and another relying only on the auxiliary antenna’s C/N0 values. The latter method proved more accurate, with a bearing estimate off by only 2.3 degrees from the true bearing of the UAV to the 5G antenna. Using two measurements, each consisting of a 360° rotation from different locations, the estimated RFI source location was determined. However, due to similar angles of both measurements towards the RFI source, it resulted in an error margin of 18.4 meters. The study concludes with recommendations for further refining the system, such as using a GNSS receiver with independent Automatic Gain Control (AGC) for each antenna input and conducting more extensive field tests with real jammers to evaluate the method’s efficacy at varying distances. Future work will also explore manual IMU calibration techniques to enhance heading accuracy in the absence of an initial GNSS heading calibration.

Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (Online)/Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (CD-ROM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Antenna Design and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.