The Impact of Ionospheric Delay on GEO GNSS Receivers and a New Perspective for TEC Estimation

The global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) signals experiment a delay when crossing the Ionosphere. This effect is particularly relevant for a satellite in a geostationary orbit (GEO) because the geometry of the orbit implies that the line of sight between the GNSS transmitter (Tx) and the receiver (Rx) crosses an earth-tangent section of the ionosphere. The antenna pattern main lobe of a GNSS transmitter is oriented towards the Earth, which implies that the strongest signals observed by a GEO satellite are those also with a larger bias due to the ionosphere, generating a degradation of the position. In this study, we use data from a real, in flight, geostationary single-frequency GNSS receivers to determine the pseudorange errors induced by the Ionospheric delay. We study several cases for exclusion of GNSS signals as a function of the elevation above the Earth level. As a reference case, we consider a 250 [Km] exclusion zone above earth level, and an enhanced exclusion zone at 1000 [Km], leading to a 97 % improvement on the position accuracy. We assess that the decreasing on the mean number of tracked satellites and a mean loss of 1.2 [dB-Hz] in the strongest measured CN0, does not threaten the quality of the positioning. The increased accuracy of the position-velocity-time (PVT) solution has a direct impact on the on-board on-orbit propagator (OOP) robustness. In fact, GNSS Rx measurements allow to periodically update the OOP, and to increase the autonomy of the propagator itself. With a new generation of satellites using GNSS to determine their position in GEO orbit, we want to emphasize the originality and uniqueness of this data to improve a tomography of the total electron counter (TEC). This information is an augmentation of the ground-based estimates of the Ionosphere.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (Online)/Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (CD-ROM)
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33012/2024.19915
Citations
2
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Ionospheric Delay on GEO GNSS Receivers and a New Perspective for TEC Estimation

Stefano Zago, Patrick Bidart, Davide Martella, Alberto Zin et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (Online)/Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (CD-ROM)
GNSS positioning and interference
2.60
article

The Impact of Ionospheric Delay on GEO GNSS Receivers and a New Perspective for TEC Estimation

Stefano Zago, Patrick Bidart, Davide Martella, Alberto Zin, Nicolas Estrada
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) signals experiment a delay when crossing the Ionosphere. This effect is particularly relevant for a satellite in a geostationary orbit (GEO) because the geometry of the orbit implies that the line of sight between the GNSS transmitter (Tx) and the receiver (Rx) crosses an earth-tangent section of the ionosphere. The antenna pattern main lobe of a GNSS transmitter is oriented towards the Earth, which implies that the strongest signals observed by a GEO satellite are those also with a larger bias due to the ionosphere, generating a degradation of the position. In this study, we use data from a real, in flight, geostationary single-frequency GNSS receivers to determine the pseudorange errors induced by the Ionospheric delay. We study several cases for exclusion of GNSS signals as a function of the elevation above the Earth level. As a reference case, we consider a 250 [Km] exclusion zone above earth level, and an enhanced exclusion zone at 1000 [Km], leading to a 97 % improvement on the position accuracy. We assess that the decreasing on the mean number of tracked satellites and a mean loss of 1.2 [dB-Hz] in the strongest measured CN0, does not threaten the quality of the positioning. The increased accuracy of the position-velocity-time (PVT) solution has a direct impact on the on-board on-orbit propagator (OOP) robustness. In fact, GNSS Rx measurements allow to periodically update the OOP, and to increase the autonomy of the propagator itself. With a new generation of satellites using GNSS to determine their position in GEO orbit, we want to emphasize the originality and uniqueness of this data to improve a tomography of the total electron counter (TEC). This information is an augmentation of the ground-based estimates of the Ionosphere.

Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (Online)/Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (CD-ROM)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
GNSS positioning and interference
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impact of Ionospheric Delay on GEO GNSS Receivers and a New Perspective for TEC Estimation — Stefano Zago, Patrick Bidart, et al. · Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (Online)/Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (CD-ROM) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS