On the issue of maintaining a balance of private and public interests in satisfying creditors’ claims in bankruptcy proceedings

The article analyzes the problems of satisfying creditors’ claims in bankruptcy proceedings. In the context of a conflict of interests of creditors caused by insufficient property of an insolvent debtor, the search for an optimal model for satisfying their claims was carried out. Common conflict situations arising between pledgees and authorized bodies have been identified. For example, in cases of satisfaction of claims for mandatory payments secured by the seizure of a taxpayer’s property. The tax authorities, as current creditors, also file claims for payment of income tax, property tax and land tax. The legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation are analyzed. It is concluded that it is necessary to eliminate the imbalance of interests of collateral creditors and authorized bodies, and restoration of the security function of the pledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.120.8.044-052
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the issue of maintaining a balance of private and public interests in satisfying creditors’ claims in bankruptcy proceedings

Т. П. Шишмарева, E. E. Enkova
Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Legal Studies and Reforms
article

On the issue of maintaining a balance of private and public interests in satisfying creditors’ claims in bankruptcy proceedings

Т. П. Шишмарева, E. E. Enkova
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes the problems of satisfying creditors’ claims in bankruptcy proceedings. In the context of a conflict of interests of creditors caused by insufficient property of an insolvent debtor, the search for an optimal model for satisfying their claims was carried out. Common conflict situations arising between pledgees and authorized bodies have been identified. For example, in cases of satisfaction of claims for mandatory payments secured by the seizure of a taxpayer’s property. The tax authorities, as current creditors, also file claims for payment of income tax, property tax and land tax. The legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation are analyzed. It is concluded that it is necessary to eliminate the imbalance of interests of collateral creditors and authorized bodies, and restoration of the security function of the pledge.

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)Vol. 1(8)
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Legal Studies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.