Medicine needs of children not addressed in the National Cancer Strategic Framework: insights from a triangulation study

Aim A better understanding of the scope of the National Cancer Strategic Framework (NCSF) could lead to improvements aiding the framework’s ultimate objective of reducing the burden of cancer. Accordingly, this report evaluates whether the 2017-2022 NCSF adequately addressed issues related to childhood cancer treatment, in particular paediatric oncology medicines. Methods To identify determinants of current access to childhood oncology medicines in South Africa, in-depth interviews were conducted with 29 stakeholders in South Africa’s public and private healthcare sectors. Key health system stakeholders included policy makers and regulators, medical insurance scheme informants, medicine suppliers, healthcare providers and civil society stakeholders. Identified barriers were categorised according to the components of the pharmaceutical value chain, and combined with a health systems approach to acknowledge the linkages of medicines with other building blocks of the health system. Identified barriers were then compared to the limitations and interventions as discussed in the 2017-2022 NCSF to identify areas for improvement in the framework. Findings Three recurrent gaps in the NCSF in relation to childhood cancers were identified, representing a range of issues throughout the pharmaceutical value chain: 1) childhood cancers are neglected compared to adult cancers, in both the policy arena and the organisation of healthcare services; 2) there are particular challenges for childhood cancers due to their rarity, thus requiring targeted interventions (e.g., regulatory incentives, tailored pricing solutions, and customised evidence requirements by decision-making bodies); and 3) children must be accompanied by a caregiver during treatment, causing several social and financial issues for their families. Conclusions There is a pressing need for a strategic cancer plan that makes proper provisions for children. Such an endeavour must commence with acknowledging the areas in which childhood cancers are different from adult cancers, and which demand targeted intervention in an update of the NCSF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Health Review
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61473/001c.118489
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medicine needs of children not addressed in the National Cancer Strategic Framework: insights from a triangulation study

Hendrika A. van den Ham, Iris R. Joosse, Fátima Suleman, Aukje K. Mantel‐Teeuwisse
1 citations
South African Health Review
Child and Adolescent Health
0.85
article

Medicine needs of children not addressed in the National Cancer Strategic Framework: insights from a triangulation study

Hendrika A. van den Ham, Iris R. Joosse, Fátima Suleman, Aukje K. Mantel‐Teeuwisse
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aim A better understanding of the scope of the National Cancer Strategic Framework (NCSF) could lead to improvements aiding the framework’s ultimate objective of reducing the burden of cancer. Accordingly, this report evaluates whether the 2017-2022 NCSF adequately addressed issues related to childhood cancer treatment, in particular paediatric oncology medicines. Methods To identify determinants of current access to childhood oncology medicines in South Africa, in-depth interviews were conducted with 29 stakeholders in South Africa’s public and private healthcare sectors. Key health system stakeholders included policy makers and regulators, medical insurance scheme informants, medicine suppliers, healthcare providers and civil society stakeholders. Identified barriers were categorised according to the components of the pharmaceutical value chain, and combined with a health systems approach to acknowledge the linkages of medicines with other building blocks of the health system. Identified barriers were then compared to the limitations and interventions as discussed in the 2017-2022 NCSF to identify areas for improvement in the framework. Findings Three recurrent gaps in the NCSF in relation to childhood cancers were identified, representing a range of issues throughout the pharmaceutical value chain: 1) childhood cancers are neglected compared to adult cancers, in both the policy arena and the organisation of healthcare services; 2) there are particular challenges for childhood cancers due to their rarity, thus requiring targeted interventions (e.g., regulatory incentives, tailored pricing solutions, and customised evidence requirements by decision-making bodies); and 3) children must be accompanied by a caregiver during treatment, causing several social and financial issues for their families. Conclusions There is a pressing need for a strategic cancer plan that makes proper provisions for children. Such an endeavour must commence with acknowledging the areas in which childhood cancers are different from adult cancers, and which demand targeted intervention in an update of the NCSF.

South African Health ReviewVol. 26
Utrecht University (NL), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Child and Adolescent Health
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.