A Quality Improvement Study for Cervical Cancer Screening: Estimating the use of cotesting versus Reflex HPV testing at the time of screening

Abstract Introduction/Objective The recommendations for cervical cancer screening have changed over the years. One of the major changes include inclusion of HPV testing in the screening protocols. A brief scan of our lab data indicated that during the period of Jan-Oct 2023, a small group of women over the age of 30 have not been co-tested. While cytology alone is acceptable, it is less sensitive than other recommended screening options. Therefore, the quality of care these women receive is acceptable but not preferred. We aim to quantify those cases, find reasons why HPV testing was not ordered, and estimate the usage of reflex HPV testing. Methods/Case Report A retrospective analysis was performed of patients screened for cervical cancer with pap testing over 10 months (Jan - Oct 2023) at Geisinger Medical Laboratories. Out of 32849 patients screened for cervical cancer, we identified 546 cases without HPV testing. A chart review of the cases was performed, followed by sending a survey to the respective providers to find out when they prefer reflex HPV testing over cotesting. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Data analysis showed that 546 out of 32849 cases were screened without co- testing by 102 providers. These providers checked the “HPV if ASCUS” option in the HPV permission section of the cytology requisition form. These cases were diagnosed as Negative for Intraepithelial Lesion on a pap test. We sent a survey to the providers, and responses showed that the reflex HPV testing option is used for patients younger than 30 years by 90% of the providers. Only 10% of providers use cytology alone due to cost issues for patients over 30. Most providers (60%) do not want the reflex testing option to be removed from the HVP permission section. Conclusion The majority of the women above 30 years of age are screened for cervical cancer with co-testing, but a small group (1.6%) is tested with cytology alone mainly due to cost-benefit hence compromising on the sensitivity of the screening test. We recommend the following changes to our cytology requisition form. If the provider selects HPV Reflex testing, the HPV test should be performed in the following scenarios: a) The pap test’s final diagnosis is NIL, and the patient is between ages 30-64. b) The pap test’s final diagnosis is ASCUS, and the patient is between ages 21 and 64. c) The pap test’s final diagnosis is LSIL; the patient is non-pregnant and between ages 25 and 64. Modifying the HPV Reflex option will improve the quality of our patient care and align our practices with current recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae129.135
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Quality Improvement Study for Cervical Cancer Screening: Estimating the use of cotesting versus Reflex HPV testing at the time of screening

Julie Hirschhorn, Donna M. Wolk, Saiama N. Waqar
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

A Quality Improvement Study for Cervical Cancer Screening: Estimating the use of cotesting versus Reflex HPV testing at the time of screening

Julie Hirschhorn, Donna M. Wolk, Saiama N. Waqar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction/Objective The recommendations for cervical cancer screening have changed over the years. One of the major changes include inclusion of HPV testing in the screening protocols. A brief scan of our lab data indicated that during the period of Jan-Oct 2023, a small group of women over the age of 30 have not been co-tested. While cytology alone is acceptable, it is less sensitive than other recommended screening options. Therefore, the quality of care these women receive is acceptable but not preferred. We aim to quantify those cases, find reasons why HPV testing was not ordered, and estimate the usage of reflex HPV testing. Methods/Case Report A retrospective analysis was performed of patients screened for cervical cancer with pap testing over 10 months (Jan - Oct 2023) at Geisinger Medical Laboratories. Out of 32849 patients screened for cervical cancer, we identified 546 cases without HPV testing. A chart review of the cases was performed, followed by sending a survey to the respective providers to find out when they prefer reflex HPV testing over cotesting. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Data analysis showed that 546 out of 32849 cases were screened without co- testing by 102 providers. These providers checked the “HPV if ASCUS” option in the HPV permission section of the cytology requisition form. These cases were diagnosed as Negative for Intraepithelial Lesion on a pap test. We sent a survey to the providers, and responses showed that the reflex HPV testing option is used for patients younger than 30 years by 90% of the providers. Only 10% of providers use cytology alone due to cost issues for patients over 30. Most providers (60%) do not want the reflex testing option to be removed from the HVP permission section. Conclusion The majority of the women above 30 years of age are screened for cervical cancer with co-testing, but a small group (1.6%) is tested with cytology alone mainly due to cost-benefit hence compromising on the sensitivity of the screening test. We recommend the following changes to our cytology requisition form. If the provider selects HPV Reflex testing, the HPV test should be performed in the following scenarios: a) The pap test’s final diagnosis is NIL, and the patient is between ages 30-64. b) The pap test’s final diagnosis is ASCUS, and the patient is between ages 21 and 64. c) The pap test’s final diagnosis is LSIL; the patient is non-pregnant and between ages 25 and 64. Modifying the HPV Reflex option will improve the quality of our patient care and align our practices with current recommendations.

American Journal of Clinical PathologyVol. 162(Supplement_1)
Geisinger Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.