Novel Approach for Detection of BRAF and KRAS Mutations Using ARMS (amplification refractory mutation system) Primers for Colon Cancer Therapeutic Response Prediction

Abstract Introduction/Objective KRAS and BRAF V600E mutations are confirmed predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy response and prognosis for colorectal cancer and often considered mutually exclusive with few exceptions (0.05% of mCRC cases). We have developed a multiplex PCR assay utilizing ARMS (amplification refractory mutation system) Primers and Probes for screening and further testing of BRAF mutation status in a 2 step process. Methods/Case Report The Multiplex PCR Assay or BRAF/KRAS mutation was designed as a 5 color assay. Primers and Probes consisted of Wild Type Kras and wild and mutant (V600E/V600K) type BRAF primers and probes. For specimen, Positive and negative control standards made of engineered positive control plasmids for wild type KRAS & BRAF and mutant type V600E & V600K BRAF as well as internal control of bet actin and 2 Patient samples with known BRAF V600E mutant status were run. Mutant type V600E & V600K BRAF were mixed with wild type V600 controls in different ratios as well. Results were interpreted as BRAF wild KRAS wild/ BRAF wild KRAS mutant/ BRAF V600E KRAS wild/BRAF V600K KRAS wild type and NGS was recommended in cases of concurrent BRAF and KRAS mutations. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Positive/negative/internal control standards for wild type KRAS & BRAF and mutant type V600E & V600K BRAF showed expected results in both CFX 96 and ABI 7500 runs in triplicates. Graphs were able to determine separate Ct values and sigmoidal amplification plots that readily differentiated KRAS wild/BRAF wild/ BRAF V600E types. Mutant type V600E & V600K BRAF that were mixed with wild type V600 controls in different ratios all showed expected results and were able to differentiate between wild and mutant types with accuracy. Also, the 2 patient samples with known (Sanger sequencing-diagnosed) V600E mutation status showed positive Ct values for KRAs wild and V600E probes and negative CT values for V600 wild/V600K probes. No invalid runs or unexpected control results were observed. Conclusion The ARMS BRAF/KRAS multiplex test is a efficient, accurate 2 step assay. In the patients and positive and negative controls prepared, it was able to reliably diagnose KRAS and BRAF mutation status in a matter of 4 hours running time. Given the fact that this is a cost effective assay that can utilize most commonly used Real time PCR machines this test may be clinically implemented if larger clinical trials utilizing tissue samples from a larger number of colon cancer patients are conducted.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae129.289
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel Approach for Detection of BRAF and KRAS Mutations Using ARMS (amplification refractory mutation system) Primers for Colon Cancer Therapeutic Response Prediction

Ja-Young Moon
1 citations
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
0.36
article

Novel Approach for Detection of BRAF and KRAS Mutations Using ARMS (amplification refractory mutation system) Primers for Colon Cancer Therapeutic Response Prediction

Ja-Young Moon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction/Objective KRAS and BRAF V600E mutations are confirmed predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy response and prognosis for colorectal cancer and often considered mutually exclusive with few exceptions (0.05% of mCRC cases). We have developed a multiplex PCR assay utilizing ARMS (amplification refractory mutation system) Primers and Probes for screening and further testing of BRAF mutation status in a 2 step process. Methods/Case Report The Multiplex PCR Assay or BRAF/KRAS mutation was designed as a 5 color assay. Primers and Probes consisted of Wild Type Kras and wild and mutant (V600E/V600K) type BRAF primers and probes. For specimen, Positive and negative control standards made of engineered positive control plasmids for wild type KRAS & BRAF and mutant type V600E & V600K BRAF as well as internal control of bet actin and 2 Patient samples with known BRAF V600E mutant status were run. Mutant type V600E & V600K BRAF were mixed with wild type V600 controls in different ratios as well. Results were interpreted as BRAF wild KRAS wild/ BRAF wild KRAS mutant/ BRAF V600E KRAS wild/BRAF V600K KRAS wild type and NGS was recommended in cases of concurrent BRAF and KRAS mutations. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Positive/negative/internal control standards for wild type KRAS & BRAF and mutant type V600E & V600K BRAF showed expected results in both CFX 96 and ABI 7500 runs in triplicates. Graphs were able to determine separate Ct values and sigmoidal amplification plots that readily differentiated KRAS wild/BRAF wild/ BRAF V600E types. Mutant type V600E & V600K BRAF that were mixed with wild type V600 controls in different ratios all showed expected results and were able to differentiate between wild and mutant types with accuracy. Also, the 2 patient samples with known (Sanger sequencing-diagnosed) V600E mutation status showed positive Ct values for KRAs wild and V600E probes and negative CT values for V600 wild/V600K probes. No invalid runs or unexpected control results were observed. Conclusion The ARMS BRAF/KRAS multiplex test is a efficient, accurate 2 step assay. In the patients and positive and negative controls prepared, it was able to reliably diagnose KRAS and BRAF mutation status in a matter of 4 hours running time. Given the fact that this is a cost effective assay that can utilize most commonly used Real time PCR machines this test may be clinically implemented if larger clinical trials utilizing tissue samples from a larger number of colon cancer patients are conducted.

American Journal of Clinical PathologyVol. 162(Supplement_1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.