The Dark Side of Forced Positivity: Why Faking Positive Emotions Can Backfire at Work

Abstract: This article explores the potential costs of enforcing strict positivity norms and emotional display rules in organizational settings. It examines the concepts of emotional labor and surface acting through a review of the academic literature documenting the personal and interpersonal tolls of dissociating outward affect from inner feelings over prolonged periods. Two real-world examples are provided of companies where mandated positivity policies backfired by damaging employee well-being, engagement, and productivity. Drawing from emotional labor theory and research on compassionate cultures, guidelines are offered for leaders seeking healthier ways to cultivate optimism without compromising psychological safety or problem-solving capacity. Specifically, the brief recommends permitting genuine expression of a full range of emotions, focusing feedback on competence rather than smiles, fostering employee autonomy, and modeling self-care behaviors. Overall, the potential damage of forcing positivity at work is examined, with practical implications discussed for balancing positivity with safety and performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human capital leadership.
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70175/hclreview.2020.13.4.8
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dark Side of Forced Positivity: Why Faking Positive Emotions Can Backfire at Work

Jonathan Westover
Human capital leadership.
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
article

The Dark Side of Forced Positivity: Why Faking Positive Emotions Can Backfire at Work

Jonathan Westover
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article explores the potential costs of enforcing strict positivity norms and emotional display rules in organizational settings. It examines the concepts of emotional labor and surface acting through a review of the academic literature documenting the personal and interpersonal tolls of dissociating outward affect from inner feelings over prolonged periods. Two real-world examples are provided of companies where mandated positivity policies backfired by damaging employee well-being, engagement, and productivity. Drawing from emotional labor theory and research on compassionate cultures, guidelines are offered for leaders seeking healthier ways to cultivate optimism without compromising psychological safety or problem-solving capacity. Specifically, the brief recommends permitting genuine expression of a full range of emotions, focusing feedback on competence rather than smiles, fostering employee autonomy, and modeling self-care behaviors. Overall, the potential damage of forcing positivity at work is examined, with practical implications discussed for balancing positivity with safety and performance.

Human capital leadership.Vol. 13(4)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.