IMPLEMENTATION OF K-MEANS AND FUZZY C-MEANS CLUSTERING FOR MAPPING TODDLER STUNTING CASES IN GUNUNGKIDUL DISTRICT

Gunungkidul Regency has the highest prevalence of stunted toddlers in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. This study aims to describe the optimal clustering results of toddler stunting cases using the k-means and fuzzy c-means methods and to describe the characteristic of the mapping results of stunting-prone areas for toddlers in Gunungkidul Regency for the years 2020 – 2022. This study maps stunting-prone areas for toddlers across 30 community health centers in Gunungkidul Regency from 2020 to 2022, with variables including the percentage of babies with low birth weight, babies born stunted, babies receiving health services, stunted toddlers, toddlers receiving health services, babies given exclusive breastfeeding, poor couples of reproductive ages, and families with adequate drinking water. The k-means clustering method determines cluster membership using the distance between objects and centroids, while the fuzzy c-means method uses the degree of membership. Cluster evaluation uses the silhouette coefficient, Calinski-Harabasz index, Davies-Bouldin index, and Dunn index to obtain optimal clustering results. The mapping results are presented as a stunting vulnerability map. The findings indicate that the optimal number of clusters is two, with the fuzzy c-means method proving more optimal than the k-means method based on evaluation scores. In 2020, there were 23 community health centers in cluster 0 and 7 in cluster 1. In 2021, there were 21 community health centers in cluster 0 and 9 in cluster 1. In 2022, there were 18 community health centers in cluster 0 and 12 in cluster 1. Generally, community health centers in cluster 0 are less optimal in specific nutrition interventions, such as for infants and toddlers. In contrast, those in cluster 1 are less optimal in sensitive nutrition interventions, such as poverty and water adequacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BAREKENG JURNAL ILMU MATEMATIKA DAN TERAPAN
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol18iss4pp2231-2246
Primary Topic
Public Health and Nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPLEMENTATION OF K-MEANS AND FUZZY C-MEANS CLUSTERING FOR MAPPING TODDLER STUNTING CASES IN GUNUNGKIDUL DISTRICT

Agus Maman Abadi, Bintang Wira Mahardika
BAREKENG JURNAL ILMU MATEMATIKA DAN TERAPAN
Public Health and Nutrition
article

IMPLEMENTATION OF K-MEANS AND FUZZY C-MEANS CLUSTERING FOR MAPPING TODDLER STUNTING CASES IN GUNUNGKIDUL DISTRICT

Agus Maman Abadi, Bintang Wira Mahardika
article en

Abstract

Gunungkidul Regency has the highest prevalence of stunted toddlers in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. This study aims to describe the optimal clustering results of toddler stunting cases using the k-means and fuzzy c-means methods and to describe the characteristic of the mapping results of stunting-prone areas for toddlers in Gunungkidul Regency for the years 2020 – 2022. This study maps stunting-prone areas for toddlers across 30 community health centers in Gunungkidul Regency from 2020 to 2022, with variables including the percentage of babies with low birth weight, babies born stunted, babies receiving health services, stunted toddlers, toddlers receiving health services, babies given exclusive breastfeeding, poor couples of reproductive ages, and families with adequate drinking water. The k-means clustering method determines cluster membership using the distance between objects and centroids, while the fuzzy c-means method uses the degree of membership. Cluster evaluation uses the silhouette coefficient, Calinski-Harabasz index, Davies-Bouldin index, and Dunn index to obtain optimal clustering results. The mapping results are presented as a stunting vulnerability map. The findings indicate that the optimal number of clusters is two, with the fuzzy c-means method proving more optimal than the k-means method based on evaluation scores. In 2020, there were 23 community health centers in cluster 0 and 7 in cluster 1. In 2021, there were 21 community health centers in cluster 0 and 9 in cluster 1. In 2022, there were 18 community health centers in cluster 0 and 12 in cluster 1. Generally, community health centers in cluster 0 are less optimal in specific nutrition interventions, such as for infants and toddlers. In contrast, those in cluster 1 are less optimal in sensitive nutrition interventions, such as poverty and water adequacy.

BAREKENG JURNAL ILMU MATEMATIKA DAN TERAPANVol. 18(4)
Yogyakarta State University (ID)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Public Health and Nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.