Authentic or artificial intelligence? Faculty’s perspectives on the ChatGPT’s impact on U.S. urban planning Ph.D. programs

Abstract This commentary article explores the impact of ChatGPT on Urban Planning Ph.D. programs within universities in the United States. Our survey reveals a high awareness of Artificial Intelligence tools (e.g. ChatGPT) among faculty yet highlights a cautious approach to integrating ChatGPT into curricula and preliminary exam settings. While some educators recognize ChatGPT’s potential to enhance research efficiency and language proficiency, especially for international students, concerns about academic integrity and the over-reliance on AI are prevalent. The commentary underscores the need for a balanced approach, advocating for ChatGPT’s use as a supplementary tool while maintaining critical thinking in doctoral preliminary exams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-024-00046-x
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authentic or artificial intelligence? Faculty’s perspectives on the ChatGPT’s impact on U.S. urban planning Ph.D. programs

Wei Zhai, Shannon Van Zandt, Yu Wei Ye, Jiaxin Du et al.
5 citations
Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.60
article

Authentic or artificial intelligence? Faculty’s perspectives on the ChatGPT’s impact on U.S. urban planning Ph.D. programs

Wei Zhai, Shannon Van Zandt, Yu Wei Ye, Jiaxin Du, Xinyue Ye
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This commentary article explores the impact of ChatGPT on Urban Planning Ph.D. programs within universities in the United States. Our survey reveals a high awareness of Artificial Intelligence tools (e.g. ChatGPT) among faculty yet highlights a cautious approach to integrating ChatGPT into curricula and preliminary exam settings. While some educators recognize ChatGPT’s potential to enhance research efficiency and language proficiency, especially for international students, concerns about academic integrity and the over-reliance on AI are prevalent. The commentary underscores the need for a balanced approach, advocating for ChatGPT’s use as a supplementary tool while maintaining critical thinking in doctoral preliminary exams.

Frontiers of Urban and Rural PlanningVol. 2(1)
The University of Texas at San Antonio (US), Grand Valley State University (US), Texas A&M University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Authentic or artificial intelligence? Faculty’s perspectives on the ChatGPT’s impact on U.S. urban planning Ph.D. programs — Wei Zhai, Shannon Van Zandt, et al. · Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS