Authentic or artificial intelligence? Faculty’s perspectives on the ChatGPT’s impact on U.S. urban planning Ph.D. programs
Abstract This commentary article explores the impact of ChatGPT on Urban Planning Ph.D. programs within universities in the United States. Our survey reveals a high awareness of Artificial Intelligence tools (e.g. ChatGPT) among faculty yet highlights a cautious approach to integrating ChatGPT into curricula and preliminary exam settings. While some educators recognize ChatGPT’s potential to enhance research efficiency and language proficiency, especially for international students, concerns about academic integrity and the over-reliance on AI are prevalent. The commentary underscores the need for a balanced approach, advocating for ChatGPT’s use as a supplementary tool while maintaining critical thinking in doctoral preliminary exams.
Authors
- Wei Zhai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5491-3508)
- Shannon Van Zandt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1640-7799)
- Yu Wei Ye (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5978-8463)
- Jiaxin Du (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8040-5748)
- Xinyue Ye (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8838-9476)
Institutions
- The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
- Grand Valley State University (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning
- Published
- 2024-10-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-024-00046-x
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.60
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Nuclear Safety and Security Commission