Slaughter of cattle without stunning: Questions related to pain, stress and endorphins

EEG studies have suggested that cattle perceive pain when bled without stunning. The present study on bleeding without stunning, compared cows that had received a local anaesthetic on the site of the bleeding cut (Lurocaine; Luro cows) one hour before bleeding with a 35 cm knife, with cows that had not (saline: Placebo cows). Various physiological indicators potentially related to pain or stress were evaluated. Increases in heart rate (P < 0.02) and cortisol levels (P < 0.001) during slaughter, compared to control levels are indicative of slaughter stress in both groups. GSH/GSSG ratio, plasma PGE2, TNFα, and NO levels and blood haematocrit levels at slaughter were not influenced by slaughter or treatment. At bleeding, excluding two out of the 15 cows with non-missing data, Placebo cows presented a longer delay between the loss of the corneal reflex and respiratory arrest. Post-mortem, Longissimus muscle of Placebo cows had a faster pH decline and remained warmer. Overall, results suggest greater stress levels in this group, probably due to pain. Plasma or brain β-endorphin contents in relevant brain structures did not increase following bleeding in either group, thus not supporting the hypothesis that stress or pain-induced release of endorphins reduces pain perceived following the cut. Furthermore, according to existing knowledge, plasma β-endorphins do not reduce pain perceived. Thus, both our study and previous research do not provide evidence that slaughter without stunning does not cause pain or other forms of stress in at least part of the animals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meat Science
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109686
Primary Topic
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Slaughter of cattle without stunning: Questions related to pain, stress and endorphins

Claudia E.M. Terlouw, D. Durand, Stéphane Andanson, Valérie Paulmier et al.
Meat Science
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Slaughter of cattle without stunning: Questions related to pain, stress and endorphins

Claudia E.M. Terlouw, D. Durand, Stéphane Andanson, Valérie Paulmier, Laurent Picgirard, Xavier Aleyrangues
article en

Abstract

EEG studies have suggested that cattle perceive pain when bled without stunning. The present study on bleeding without stunning, compared cows that had received a local anaesthetic on the site of the bleeding cut (Lurocaine; Luro cows) one hour before bleeding with a 35 cm knife, with cows that had not (saline: Placebo cows). Various physiological indicators potentially related to pain or stress were evaluated. Increases in heart rate (P < 0.02) and cortisol levels (P < 0.001) during slaughter, compared to control levels are indicative of slaughter stress in both groups. GSH/GSSG ratio, plasma PGE2, TNFα, and NO levels and blood haematocrit levels at slaughter were not influenced by slaughter or treatment. At bleeding, excluding two out of the 15 cows with non-missing data, Placebo cows presented a longer delay between the loss of the corneal reflex and respiratory arrest. Post-mortem, Longissimus muscle of Placebo cows had a faster pH decline and remained warmer. Overall, results suggest greater stress levels in this group, probably due to pain. Plasma or brain β-endorphin contents in relevant brain structures did not increase following bleeding in either group, thus not supporting the hypothesis that stress or pain-induced release of endorphins reduces pain perceived following the cut. Furthermore, according to existing knowledge, plasma β-endorphins do not reduce pain perceived. Thus, both our study and previous research do not provide evidence that slaughter without stunning does not cause pain or other forms of stress in at least part of the animals.

Meat ScienceVol. 219
Université Clermont Auvergne (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), University of Clermont Auvergne (FR), VetAgro Sup (FR), Physique et Physiologie Intégratives de l'Arbre en Environnement Fluctuant (FR), Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores (FR), Association pour le Developpement de l'Institut de la Viande (FR), Clermont Université (FR)
Institut National de Recherche en Sciences et Technologies pour l'Environnement et l'Agriculture, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Directorate for Biological Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.