Pleomorphic dermal sarcoma. UK multidisciplinary team members have wide variation in opinions on management and pathways

Pleomorphic Dermal Sarcoma (PDS) is increasing in incidence and evidence-based guidelines as to optimal management are lacking. It is unclear from guidance which cancer MDTs should be involved in the care of patients with PDS and there is anecdotally widespread variation in patient pathways and management. To determine current pathways and opinions regarding management of PDS amongst members of relevant UK MDTs. A survey was devised, piloted, and circulated to MDT members, via national organisations. Responses were analysed using online SurveyMonkey tools. 105 consultant members of a relevant MDT responded, including 19 skin and 2 sarcoma MDT Chairs. There was widespread variation in referral pathways, with 25.7% of participants reporting no sarcoma MDT involvement in a hypothetical case of a patient with a 2.1 ​cm primary PDS of the scalp, with no clinically apparent regional or distant metastases (N0M0). Opinions on the correct peripheral and deep surgical excision margins (PM/DM) varied, with the majority choosing a 10 ​mm PM (53.3%). Taking periosteum as the deep margin was preferred by 50.5%. Histological clearance margins of at least 5 ​mm at the PM and at least 1 ​mm at the DM were preferred by 33.3% of participants and deemed to be acceptable as definitive treatment. Imaging at diagnosis and for surveillance showed wide variation, with 24.8% not offering any imaging at diagnosis, in the above case. PDS pathways and clinical management have been shown to vary widely amongst UK MDT members. A modified Delphi study is proposed to develop consensus-based guidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Surgical Oncology
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cson.2024.100061
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pleomorphic dermal sarcoma. UK multidisciplinary team members have wide variation in opinions on management and pathways

Carrie Newlands, Elizabeth Gruber, Franel Le Grange, Simon Whitley et al.
1 citations
Clinical Surgical Oncology
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
0.42
article

Pleomorphic dermal sarcoma. UK multidisciplinary team members have wide variation in opinions on management and pathways

Carrie Newlands, Elizabeth Gruber, Franel Le Grange, Simon Whitley, Stephen Keohane, Rajiv Anand
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pleomorphic Dermal Sarcoma (PDS) is increasing in incidence and evidence-based guidelines as to optimal management are lacking. It is unclear from guidance which cancer MDTs should be involved in the care of patients with PDS and there is anecdotally widespread variation in patient pathways and management. To determine current pathways and opinions regarding management of PDS amongst members of relevant UK MDTs. A survey was devised, piloted, and circulated to MDT members, via national organisations. Responses were analysed using online SurveyMonkey tools. 105 consultant members of a relevant MDT responded, including 19 skin and 2 sarcoma MDT Chairs. There was widespread variation in referral pathways, with 25.7% of participants reporting no sarcoma MDT involvement in a hypothetical case of a patient with a 2.1 ​cm primary PDS of the scalp, with no clinically apparent regional or distant metastases (N0M0). Opinions on the correct peripheral and deep surgical excision margins (PM/DM) varied, with the majority choosing a 10 ​mm PM (53.3%). Taking periosteum as the deep margin was preferred by 50.5%. Histological clearance margins of at least 5 ​mm at the PM and at least 1 ​mm at the DM were preferred by 33.3% of participants and deemed to be acceptable as definitive treatment. Imaging at diagnosis and for surveillance showed wide variation, with 24.8% not offering any imaging at diagnosis, in the above case. PDS pathways and clinical management have been shown to vary widely amongst UK MDT members. A modified Delphi study is proposed to develop consensus-based guidance.

Clinical Surgical OncologyVol. 3(4)
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Surrey (GB), Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.