Proposed Amendments to the Civil Code regarding the Validity of Declarations of Intent

This article analyzes the main contents of the proposed amendments to the Civil Code suggested by the Civil Code Amendment Committee, which was launched on June 16, 2023, in relation to the validity of declarations of intent from a legislative policy and comparative law perspective. First, the proposed amendments maintain the current law for Articles 107, 108, and 110, except for minor modifications in wording. Next, the proposed amendment to Article 109 on mistakes explicitly includes mistakes regarding the juridical act's necessary basis (Grundlagenirrtum) and mistakes induced by the other party as grounds for avoidance. It also modifies the wording of the essential part requirement to clarify the subjective and objective causal relationships as its meaning. Furthermore, it exceptionally allows avoidance even when the declarant is grossly negligent, provided that the other party is also grossly negligent. These changes reflect both case law and comparative law. However, the proposed amendment does not accept the declarant's liability for damages in case of negligence and leaves the possibility of contract modification in case of mutual mistakes to doctrine and case law. Meanwhile, the newly introduced Article 110-2 recognizes a new ground for avoidance when the declarant makes a declaration of intent under undue interference in their decision-making due to a state of psychological dependence or a close relationship of trust. This rule attempts to introduce the common law doctrine of undue influence and protect the autonomy of intent in a manner equivalent to fraud and duress. The content and direction of the above-mentioned amendments appropriately reflect the current state of our doctrine and case law and align with recent legislative trends from a comparative law perspective.

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Association of Civil Law
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52554/kjcl.2024.108.93
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proposed Amendments to the Civil Code regarding the Validity of Declarations of Intent

The Korean Association of Civil Law
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

Proposed Amendments to the Civil Code regarding the Validity of Declarations of Intent

article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the main contents of the proposed amendments to the Civil Code suggested by the Civil Code Amendment Committee, which was launched on June 16, 2023, in relation to the validity of declarations of intent from a legislative policy and comparative law perspective. First, the proposed amendments maintain the current law for Articles 107, 108, and 110, except for minor modifications in wording. Next, the proposed amendment to Article 109 on mistakes explicitly includes mistakes regarding the juridical act's necessary basis (Grundlagenirrtum) and mistakes induced by the other party as grounds for avoidance. It also modifies the wording of the essential part requirement to clarify the subjective and objective causal relationships as its meaning. Furthermore, it exceptionally allows avoidance even when the declarant is grossly negligent, provided that the other party is also grossly negligent. These changes reflect both case law and comparative law. However, the proposed amendment does not accept the declarant's liability for damages in case of negligence and leaves the possibility of contract modification in case of mutual mistakes to doctrine and case law. Meanwhile, the newly introduced Article 110-2 recognizes a new ground for avoidance when the declarant makes a declaration of intent under undue interference in their decision-making due to a state of psychological dependence or a close relationship of trust. This rule attempts to introduce the common law doctrine of undue influence and protect the autonomy of intent in a manner equivalent to fraud and duress. The content and direction of the above-mentioned amendments appropriately reflect the current state of our doctrine and case law and align with recent legislative trends from a comparative law perspective.

The Korean Association of Civil LawVol. 108
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Proposed Amendments to the Civil Code regarding the Validity of Declarations of Intent · The Korean Association of Civil Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS