An assessment of node–head–flow relationships at lumped demand nodes for pressure-dependent analysis of water distribution networks

ABSTRACT Pressure-dependent analysis (PDA) is preferred over demand-dependent analysis (DDA) to evaluate the performance of any water distribution network under pressure-deficient conditions. The PDA requires a relationship, called node–head–flow relationship (NHFR) between available head and available flow at a node to know whether the demand is fulfilled completely, partially, or not at all, depending on the available pressure. Several types of NHFRs have been suggested in the past and mostly a single type of NHFR is used at different nodes. An assessment of these NHFRs is carried out to know how accurate the use of a single type of NHFR is for the lumped nodes. The errors in prediction of the available nodal flows through the available NHFRs and that obtained through the detailed analysis are quantified using chi square. It is observed that actual NHFR is not as smooth as approximated by the different available NHFRs. A nonlinear behaviour between available flows and available heads exists for partial flow conditions and requires proper values of constants to define any NHFR. Furthermore, NHFRs at different lumped nodes in a network are different. This study recommends the consideration of different relationships at different lumped nodes of the network for PDA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Science & Technology Water Supply
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2024.227
Primary Topic
Water Systems and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An assessment of node–head–flow relationships at lumped demand nodes for pressure-dependent analysis of water distribution networks

Rajesh Gupta, Satyam Tiwari
Water Science & Technology Water Supply
Water Systems and Optimization
article

An assessment of node–head–flow relationships at lumped demand nodes for pressure-dependent analysis of water distribution networks

Rajesh Gupta, Satyam Tiwari
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pressure-dependent analysis (PDA) is preferred over demand-dependent analysis (DDA) to evaluate the performance of any water distribution network under pressure-deficient conditions. The PDA requires a relationship, called node–head–flow relationship (NHFR) between available head and available flow at a node to know whether the demand is fulfilled completely, partially, or not at all, depending on the available pressure. Several types of NHFRs have been suggested in the past and mostly a single type of NHFR is used at different nodes. An assessment of these NHFRs is carried out to know how accurate the use of a single type of NHFR is for the lumped nodes. The errors in prediction of the available nodal flows through the available NHFRs and that obtained through the detailed analysis are quantified using chi square. It is observed that actual NHFR is not as smooth as approximated by the different available NHFRs. A nonlinear behaviour between available flows and available heads exists for partial flow conditions and requires proper values of constants to define any NHFR. Furthermore, NHFRs at different lumped nodes in a network are different. This study recommends the consideration of different relationships at different lumped nodes of the network for PDA.

Water Science & Technology Water SupplyVol. 24(10)
Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology (IN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Water Systems and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.