Through the Lens of Fairness: A Qualitative Investigation into Co‐workers’ Perceptions of I‐deals

Abstract Amidst the rapidly evolving work environment that increasingly necessitates personalized approaches towards employees, there is a pressing need to broaden our understanding of idiosyncratic deals (i‐deals) and their third‐party implications in the workplace. Although immediate responses to i‐deals often hinge on equity and social comparison, this approach does not fully explain co‐workers’ perceptions of others’ i‐deals. By reconciling various theoretical accounts, we propose that co‐workers’ perceptions of i‐deals largely depend on the implementation of i‐deals and related justice perceptions of co‐workers. However, our understanding of how i‐deal implementation shapes co‐workers’ perceptions of i‐deals from a justice perspective remains limited. Therefore, we conducted an inductive multiple‐case study through 48 in‐depth interviews involving managers, i‐deal receivers (i‐dealers), and co‐workers. Building on our findings, we develop an emergent framework that explains how the implementation of i‐deals, when viewed through the lens of organizational justice, can shape co‐workers’ perceptions of i‐deals. This novel perspective enriches the i‐deal literature by offering a fresh angle on the third‐party implications of i‐deals, emphasizing the significance of their implementation and related fairness perceptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Studies
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13151
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Through the Lens of Fairness: A Qualitative Investigation into Co‐workers’ Perceptions of I‐deals

Maryam Aldossari, Susan Murphy, Sona Gachayeva
13 citations
Journal of Management Studies
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
8.77
article

Through the Lens of Fairness: A Qualitative Investigation into Co‐workers’ Perceptions of I‐deals

Maryam Aldossari, Susan Murphy, Sona Gachayeva
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Abstract Amidst the rapidly evolving work environment that increasingly necessitates personalized approaches towards employees, there is a pressing need to broaden our understanding of idiosyncratic deals (i‐deals) and their third‐party implications in the workplace. Although immediate responses to i‐deals often hinge on equity and social comparison, this approach does not fully explain co‐workers’ perceptions of others’ i‐deals. By reconciling various theoretical accounts, we propose that co‐workers’ perceptions of i‐deals largely depend on the implementation of i‐deals and related justice perceptions of co‐workers. However, our understanding of how i‐deal implementation shapes co‐workers’ perceptions of i‐deals from a justice perspective remains limited. Therefore, we conducted an inductive multiple‐case study through 48 in‐depth interviews involving managers, i‐deal receivers (i‐dealers), and co‐workers. Building on our findings, we develop an emergent framework that explains how the implementation of i‐deals, when viewed through the lens of organizational justice, can shape co‐workers’ perceptions of i‐deals. This novel perspective enriches the i‐deal literature by offering a fresh angle on the third‐party implications of i‐deals, emphasizing the significance of their implementation and related fairness perceptions.

Journal of Management StudiesVol. 62(7)
University of Stirling (GB), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
8.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.