Intellectual humility and the learning sciences: can self-reports and behavioral measures coexist to understand civic engagement?

Recent political events across the globe have illustrated a resurgence in people’s intolerance to ideas different from their own. We mobilize the idea of intellectual humility to assess how extant psychological theories account for individual differences in people’s tolerance for conflicting ideas. Then, we introduce concepts from the Learning Sciences to determine how alternative methodologies could augment research on intellectual humility and civic engagement. Last, we summarize these analyses by pointing to their relations with three intersecting challenges and solutions regarding studying IH in multiple contexts and with new multiple data sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451306
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intellectual humility and the learning sciences: can self-reports and behavioral measures coexist to understand civic engagement?

Matthew Lira, Stacey E. McElroy‐Heltzel
1 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.10
article

Intellectual humility and the learning sciences: can self-reports and behavioral measures coexist to understand civic engagement?

Matthew Lira, Stacey E. McElroy‐Heltzel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recent political events across the globe have illustrated a resurgence in people’s intolerance to ideas different from their own. We mobilize the idea of intellectual humility to assess how extant psychological theories account for individual differences in people’s tolerance for conflicting ideas. Then, we introduce concepts from the Learning Sciences to determine how alternative methodologies could augment research on intellectual humility and civic engagement. Last, we summarize these analyses by pointing to their relations with three intersecting challenges and solutions regarding studying IH in multiple contexts and with new multiple data sources.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 15(182)
University of Iowa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.