Co mohu poznat, a co jen uznat? Výchozí epistemologické problémy ve filosofii Roberta Spaemanna

The paper analyses two preliminary epistemological problems in Robert Spaemann’s philosophy that have not yet been addressed as mutually linked. The common root of both problems lies in the way Spaemann specifically applies Kant’s statement “being is not a real predicate”. The first problem concerns the criteria for distinguishing between waking and dream cognition, the second the criteria for distinguishing a living being from a simulation. The analysis shows, among other things, the broader context of Spaemann’s epistemological position, its three main characteristics, and Spaemann’s specific use of the term Anerkennung (“acknowledgement”), which he adopted from German idealism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
REFLEXE
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2024.25
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co mohu poznat, a co jen uznat? Výchozí epistemologické problémy ve filosofii Roberta Spaemanna

Vojtěch Šimek
REFLEXE
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Co mohu poznat, a co jen uznat? Výchozí epistemologické problémy ve filosofii Roberta Spaemanna

Vojtěch Šimek
article en

Abstract

The paper analyses two preliminary epistemological problems in Robert Spaemann’s philosophy that have not yet been addressed as mutually linked. The common root of both problems lies in the way Spaemann specifically applies Kant’s statement “being is not a real predicate”. The first problem concerns the criteria for distinguishing between waking and dream cognition, the second the criteria for distinguishing a living being from a simulation. The analysis shows, among other things, the broader context of Spaemann’s epistemological position, its three main characteristics, and Spaemann’s specific use of the term Anerkennung (“acknowledgement”), which he adopted from German idealism.

REFLEXEVol. 2024(66)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Co mohu poznat, a co jen uznat? Výchozí epistemologické problémy ve filosofii Roberta Spaemanna — Vojtěch Šimek · REFLEXE (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS