Deerminants of watchdog journalism: A global empirical approach

This article introduces and examines a hierarchical model of influences that identifies the variables affecting the watchdog role of journalists at three levels: the societal (press freedom and democracy), the organizational (media ownership), and the individual (editorial autonomy and perceived influences) on a global scale. Using data from 27,567 journalists in 6403 media organizations across 67 countries, the model's validity is confirmed. The findings reveal that variations in journalists’ perception of their role are more pronounced at the societal level compared to the organizational and individual levels. Furthermore, journalists tend to assume a watchdog role more prominently within public media as opposed to private or state-run outlets. Surprisingly, press freedom and democracy have a weak and insignificant impact on watchdog journalism, challenging established norms in the literature, a result that we critically discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Communication Gazette
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485241288401
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deerminants of watchdog journalism: A global empirical approach

Basyouni Ibrahim Hamada, Abdel‐Salam G. Abdel‐Salam
4 citations
International Communication Gazette
Media Influence and Politics
4.53
article

Deerminants of watchdog journalism: A global empirical approach

Basyouni Ibrahim Hamada, Abdel‐Salam G. Abdel‐Salam
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This article introduces and examines a hierarchical model of influences that identifies the variables affecting the watchdog role of journalists at three levels: the societal (press freedom and democracy), the organizational (media ownership), and the individual (editorial autonomy and perceived influences) on a global scale. Using data from 27,567 journalists in 6403 media organizations across 67 countries, the model's validity is confirmed. The findings reveal that variations in journalists’ perception of their role are more pronounced at the societal level compared to the organizational and individual levels. Furthermore, journalists tend to assume a watchdog role more prominently within public media as opposed to private or state-run outlets. Surprisingly, press freedom and democracy have a weak and insignificant impact on watchdog journalism, challenging established norms in the literature, a result that we critically discussed.

International Communication GazetteVol. 87(3)
Qatar University (QA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Media Influence and Politics
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deerminants of watchdog journalism: A global empirical approach — Basyouni Ibrahim Hamada, Abdel‐Salam G. Abdel‐Salam · International Communication Gazette (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS