Considerations for the Design of Informed Consent in Digital Health Research: Participant Perspectives

The research team, prospective participants, and written materials all influence the success of the informed consent process. As digital health research becomes more prevalent, new challenges for successful informed consent are introduced. This exploratory research utilized a human centered design process in which 19 people were enrolled to participate in one of four online focus-groups. Participants discussed their experiences with informed consent, preferences for receiving study information and ideas about alternative consent approaches. Data were analyzed using qualitative methods. Six major themes and sixteen sub-themes were identified that included study information that prospective participants would like to receive, preferences for accessing information and a desire to connect with research team members. Specific to digital health, participants expressed a need to understand how the technologies worked and how the volume of granular personal information would be collected, stored, and shared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646241290078
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerations for the Design of Informed Consent in Digital Health Research: Participant Perspectives

Camille Nebeker, Daniah Kareem, Brian McInnis, Ramona Pindus
4 citations
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Ethics in Clinical Research
2.17
article

Considerations for the Design of Informed Consent in Digital Health Research: Participant Perspectives

Camille Nebeker, Daniah Kareem, Brian McInnis, Ramona Pindus
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The research team, prospective participants, and written materials all influence the success of the informed consent process. As digital health research becomes more prevalent, new challenges for successful informed consent are introduced. This exploratory research utilized a human centered design process in which 19 people were enrolled to participate in one of four online focus-groups. Participants discussed their experiences with informed consent, preferences for receiving study information and ideas about alternative consent approaches. Data were analyzed using qualitative methods. Six major themes and sixteen sub-themes were identified that included study information that prospective participants would like to receive, preferences for accessing information and a desire to connect with research team members. Specific to digital health, participants expressed a need to understand how the technologies worked and how the volume of granular personal information would be collected, stored, and shared.

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research EthicsVol. 19(4-5)
University of California San Diego (US), Human Longevity (United States) (US)
National Science Foundation, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics in Clinical Research
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Considerations for the Design of Informed Consent in Digital Health Research: Participant Perspectives — Camille Nebeker, Daniah Kareem, et al. · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS