Do popular delusions deserve a more positive reputation? A commentary on "<i>Why Delusions Matter</i>"
In "Why Delusions Matter", Lisa Bortolotti argues both that the concept of delusions should be extended to cover certain beliefs that bear no relationship to pathology, and that delusions deserve a more positive reputation. Drawing attention to the role of self-serving propaganda in prominent examples of non-clinical delusions, I argue that there is a tension between these parts of the project.
Authors
- Daniel R. Williams (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9774-2910)
Institutions
- University of Sussex (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Philosophy and the Mind Sciences
- Published
- 2024-10-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.11517
- Primary Topic
- Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00