Predictors of Failed Outcomes in Ureteral Reconstruction: A Real-World Retrospective Study

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Ureteral reconstruction is aimed at maintaining ureteral patency without the need for long-term catheters like ureteral stents or percutaneous nephrostomies. Different surgical strategies are adopted based on the etiology, the location of the injury, and the severity of the injury. We aimed to analyze the parameters that can predict which patients might not be free from further catheterization after reconstruction. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> This study included patients who underwent ureteral reconstruction from January 2007 to December 2021. The success of ureteral reconstruction was defined as being free from further catheterization after the operation. <i>Results:</i> A total of 184 patients underwent ureteral reconstruction. Malignant disease with ureteral invasion and iatrogenic injuries accounted for 79.9% of the cases. The majority (79.3%) did not have to undergo subsequent interventions. Predictors for a failed result of ureteral reconstruction included a history of radiotherapy (OR = 2.75, <i>p</i> = 0.01), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR = 3.42, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and an upper ureteric location of the injury (OR = 5.68, <i>p</i> = 0.042). <i>Conclusions:</i> A history of radiation therapy, an upper third ureteric location of the injury, and CKD were identified as predictors of a failed ureteral reconstruction. Malignant diseases, surgical methods, and repair techniques did not significantly affect the outcome of the operation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101672
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ureteral procedures and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of Failed Outcomes in Ureteral Reconstruction: A Real-World Retrospective Study

Cheng‐Che Chen, Chuan-Shu Chen, Kun‐Yuan Chiu, Shian‐Shiang Wang et al.
2 citations
Medicina
Ureteral procedures and complications
1.17
article

Predictors of Failed Outcomes in Ureteral Reconstruction: A Real-World Retrospective Study

Cheng‐Che Chen, Chuan-Shu Chen, Kun‐Yuan Chiu, Shian‐Shiang Wang, J H Lee, Yu-Ju Lin, Chin-Fu Lin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Ureteral reconstruction is aimed at maintaining ureteral patency without the need for long-term catheters like ureteral stents or percutaneous nephrostomies. Different surgical strategies are adopted based on the etiology, the location of the injury, and the severity of the injury. We aimed to analyze the parameters that can predict which patients might not be free from further catheterization after reconstruction. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> This study included patients who underwent ureteral reconstruction from January 2007 to December 2021. The success of ureteral reconstruction was defined as being free from further catheterization after the operation. <i>Results:</i> A total of 184 patients underwent ureteral reconstruction. Malignant disease with ureteral invasion and iatrogenic injuries accounted for 79.9% of the cases. The majority (79.3%) did not have to undergo subsequent interventions. Predictors for a failed result of ureteral reconstruction included a history of radiotherapy (OR = 2.75, <i>p</i> = 0.01), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR = 3.42, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and an upper ureteric location of the injury (OR = 5.68, <i>p</i> = 0.042). <i>Conclusions:</i> A history of radiation therapy, an upper third ureteric location of the injury, and CKD were identified as predictors of a failed ureteral reconstruction. Malignant diseases, surgical methods, and repair techniques did not significantly affect the outcome of the operation.

MedicinaVol. 60(10)
Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW), Hungkuang University (TW)
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ureteral procedures and complications
1.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.