On the manipulator-focused response to manipulation cases

In this paper, we identify a class of responses to cases of manipulation that we label <i>manipulator-focused views</i>. The key insight of such views is that being subject to the will of another agent significantly affects our freedom and moral responsibility. Though different authors take this key insight in different directions, and the mechanics of their views are quite different, these views turn out to share many key components, and this allows us to discuss several authors' views at the same time, highlighting a variety of challenges for such views and helping to identify pitfalls to avoid in further developments of views of this type. Moreover, as we survey manipulator-focused views and the challenges that plague them, we go beyond the typical problem cases for such views-natural force variations of manipulation cases-and introduce several new manipulation cases. We conclude by comparing the prospects for this family of views with its main rival, namely bypassing views.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Studies
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02218-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Free Will and Agency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the manipulator-focused response to manipulation cases

Gabriel De Marco, Taylor W. Cyr
2 citations
Philosophical Studies
Free Will and Agency
0.69
article

On the manipulator-focused response to manipulation cases

Gabriel De Marco, Taylor W. Cyr
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we identify a class of responses to cases of manipulation that we label <i>manipulator-focused views</i>. The key insight of such views is that being subject to the will of another agent significantly affects our freedom and moral responsibility. Though different authors take this key insight in different directions, and the mechanics of their views are quite different, these views turn out to share many key components, and this allows us to discuss several authors' views at the same time, highlighting a variety of challenges for such views and helping to identify pitfalls to avoid in further developments of views of this type. Moreover, as we survey manipulator-focused views and the challenges that plague them, we go beyond the typical problem cases for such views-natural force variations of manipulation cases-and introduce several new manipulation cases. We conclude by comparing the prospects for this family of views with its main rival, namely bypassing views.

Philosophical StudiesVol. 181(11)
University of Oxford (GB), Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities (GB), Samford University (US)
H2020 European Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Free Will and Agency
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.