Explaining microvariation using the Tolerance Principle: plugging the <i>amn’t</i> gap
Abstract In this article, we describe and explain patterns of variation in acceptance of amn’t in varieties of Scots, drawing upon data from the Scots Syntax Atlas. Partly in line with findings from Bresnan (2001), we show that amn’t is much more widely accepted in inversion environments ( amn’t I ?) than in declaratives ( I amn’t ), but nevertheless, amn’t in declaratives is still accepted in certain regions of Scotland. We combine the productivity-based explanation of the amn’t gap in Yang (2016, 2017) with new insights into the syntax of Scots negation from Thoms et al. (2023) to provide a predictive account of the attested variation.
Authors
- Elizabeth R. Jamieson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8679-3360)
- Gary Thoms (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5790-675X)
- David Adger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3253-5400)
- Caroline Heycock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1615-6328)
- Jennifer Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6825-7118)
Institutions
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- University of York (GB)
- New York University (US)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Linguistics
- Published
- 2024-10-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226724000203
- Primary Topic
- Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Yale University
- Arts and Humanities Research Council