Do you know what your senator advocates for in the committees they participate in? An LLM-based approach to topic and stance detection in parliamentary discussions

The legislative power in Brazil faces challenges in making discussions more accessible to the population, which is essential for strengthening democracy. Although stenographic notes of the Senate and House of Representatives committee meetings are publicly available, their length and volume make it impractical for citizens to follow what actually happens in those meetings. Therefore, a tool that can automatically extract useful and summarized information from these discussions would be transformative, empowering voters to monitor their representatives more effectively. This study investigates the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) for detecting relevant topics and stances of parliamentarians. We conducted experiments using GPT-3.5-Turbo to interpret shorthand notes from the Federal Senate in 2023. The results were promising, with an average accuracy of 70% and 60% for topic and stance detection, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5753/sbbd_estendido.2024.243776
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do you know what your senator advocates for in the committees they participate in? An LLM-based approach to topic and stance detection in parliamentary discussions

Cláudio E. C. Campelo, Helen Bento Cavalcanti
1 links
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Do you know what your senator advocates for in the committees they participate in? An LLM-based approach to topic and stance detection in parliamentary discussions

Cláudio E. C. Campelo, Helen Bento Cavalcanti
article en

Abstract

The legislative power in Brazil faces challenges in making discussions more accessible to the population, which is essential for strengthening democracy. Although stenographic notes of the Senate and House of Representatives committee meetings are publicly available, their length and volume make it impractical for citizens to follow what actually happens in those meetings. Therefore, a tool that can automatically extract useful and summarized information from these discussions would be transformative, empowering voters to monitor their representatives more effectively. This study investigates the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) for detecting relevant topics and stances of parliamentarians. We conducted experiments using GPT-3.5-Turbo to interpret shorthand notes from the Federal Senate in 2023. The results were promising, with an average accuracy of 70% and 60% for topic and stance detection, respectively.

Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.