Changes in the nutritional status of children with cancer depending on clinical, demographic and social factors

Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the nutritional status of children undergoing cancer treatment and to assess changes in the nutritional status depending on selected clinical, demographic, and social factors. Methods This was a single-center prospective cohort study of children aged 2 to 18 years, who were diagnosed with cancer and received treatment between October 2019 and January 2022. The nutritional status of patients was evaluated before and after cancer treatment based on the measurements of weight, body mass index (BMI), height, and arm anthropometry (mid-upper arm circumference [MUAC], triceps skinfold thickness [TSFT], and subscapular skinfold thickness [SCFT]). Body composition (upper arm muscle area [UMA], arm fat index [AFI], and the sum of SCFT and TSFT [SFsum]) was also assessed. Additionally, the nutritional status of patients at baseline was compared with that of the control group including 30 healthy children. The obtained results were analyzed depending on selected demographic, clinical, and social factors. Results The study included 40 patients (median age, 11.29 years [range, 5.25-13.27 years]; men, 67.5%). At baseline, malnutrition was reported in 5% and 7.5% of children based on weight and BMI, respectively, and in 7.5% of patients based on MUAC. At follow-up, malnutrition increased by 17.5% based on body weight and BMI and by 2.5% based on MUAC. UMA allowed the diagnosis of protein-energy malnutrition in 27.5% of patients. Moreover, low UMA was significantly more common in children with cancer than in controls. Overnutrition at follow-up was identified in a higher percentage of patients based on AFI and SFsum measurements than based on BMI (27.5%, 35%, and 10%, respectively). There were no differences in anthropometric measurements and body composition depending on the type of cancer, intensity of treatment, and place of residence. However, weight, BMI, MUAC, UMA, and SFsum were higher in males, suggesting the possible effect of sex. A higher prevalence of underweight determined by BMI was noted in patients whose parents had university education or were between the age of 18 to 35 years. Conclusions Children with cancer show changes in the nutritional status compared with healthy children. Body composition can be used to identify these changes with greater accuracy than anthropometric measurements such as weight, height, BMI, and arm anthropometry. The risk of changes in the nutritional status can be determined based on selected clinical, demographic, and social factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Haematologica Polonica
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5603/ahp.101236
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in the nutritional status of children with cancer depending on clinical, demographic and social factors

Katarzyna Drabko, Anna Milaniuk
1 citations
Acta Haematologica Polonica
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
1.11
article

Changes in the nutritional status of children with cancer depending on clinical, demographic and social factors

Katarzyna Drabko, Anna Milaniuk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the nutritional status of children undergoing cancer treatment and to assess changes in the nutritional status depending on selected clinical, demographic, and social factors. Methods This was a single-center prospective cohort study of children aged 2 to 18 years, who were diagnosed with cancer and received treatment between October 2019 and January 2022. The nutritional status of patients was evaluated before and after cancer treatment based on the measurements of weight, body mass index (BMI), height, and arm anthropometry (mid-upper arm circumference [MUAC], triceps skinfold thickness [TSFT], and subscapular skinfold thickness [SCFT]). Body composition (upper arm muscle area [UMA], arm fat index [AFI], and the sum of SCFT and TSFT [SFsum]) was also assessed. Additionally, the nutritional status of patients at baseline was compared with that of the control group including 30 healthy children. The obtained results were analyzed depending on selected demographic, clinical, and social factors. Results The study included 40 patients (median age, 11.29 years [range, 5.25-13.27 years]; men, 67.5%). At baseline, malnutrition was reported in 5% and 7.5% of children based on weight and BMI, respectively, and in 7.5% of patients based on MUAC. At follow-up, malnutrition increased by 17.5% based on body weight and BMI and by 2.5% based on MUAC. UMA allowed the diagnosis of protein-energy malnutrition in 27.5% of patients. Moreover, low UMA was significantly more common in children with cancer than in controls. Overnutrition at follow-up was identified in a higher percentage of patients based on AFI and SFsum measurements than based on BMI (27.5%, 35%, and 10%, respectively). There were no differences in anthropometric measurements and body composition depending on the type of cancer, intensity of treatment, and place of residence. However, weight, BMI, MUAC, UMA, and SFsum were higher in males, suggesting the possible effect of sex. A higher prevalence of underweight determined by BMI was noted in patients whose parents had university education or were between the age of 18 to 35 years. Conclusions Children with cancer show changes in the nutritional status compared with healthy children. Body composition can be used to identify these changes with greater accuracy than anthropometric measurements such as weight, height, BMI, and arm anthropometry. The risk of changes in the nutritional status can be determined based on selected clinical, demographic, and social factors.

Acta Haematologica PolonicaVol. 55(5)
Medical University of Lublin (PL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.