Academic Assessments and iPads: Performance of Students from a Low Performing Urban Elementary School

Abstract Technology in education is used to support and supplement core instruction, to help students stay engaged, and assist teachers with academic assessments. While there is support in the use of technology in instruction and intervention, researchers still urge caution when using it in assessment. Current evidence suggests that students perform differently when assessed using traditional methods compared to technology-based methods. Further, these differences may be exacerbated for students from low-income economically marginalized at-risk communities. There is a need to thoroughly explore student performance when responding to assessment materials through different modalities. The current investigation used a within subjects group design to replicate Reynolds et al. (2023) using an urban low performing population. Results demonstrate that, on average, students answered more digits correct per minute on probes administered via paper-pencil, however preferred to answer problems on the iPad using a keyboard. These results differ from the original study that used a higher performing suburban population. Future research, limitations, and implications for educators are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary School Psychology
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-024-00527-2
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Academic Assessments and iPads: Performance of Students from a Low Performing Urban Elementary School

Kathleen B. Aspiranti, Erin E. C. Henze, Jennifer L. Reynolds, Lauren M. Kall
Contemporary School Psychology
Child Development and Digital Technology
article

Academic Assessments and iPads: Performance of Students from a Low Performing Urban Elementary School

Kathleen B. Aspiranti, Erin E. C. Henze, Jennifer L. Reynolds, Lauren M. Kall
article en

Abstract

Abstract Technology in education is used to support and supplement core instruction, to help students stay engaged, and assist teachers with academic assessments. While there is support in the use of technology in instruction and intervention, researchers still urge caution when using it in assessment. Current evidence suggests that students perform differently when assessed using traditional methods compared to technology-based methods. Further, these differences may be exacerbated for students from low-income economically marginalized at-risk communities. There is a need to thoroughly explore student performance when responding to assessment materials through different modalities. The current investigation used a within subjects group design to replicate Reynolds et al. (2023) using an urban low performing population. Results demonstrate that, on average, students answered more digits correct per minute on probes administered via paper-pencil, however preferred to answer problems on the iPad using a keyboard. These results differ from the original study that used a higher performing suburban population. Future research, limitations, and implications for educators are discussed.

Contemporary School Psychology
University of Kentucky (US), University of Detroit Mercy (US), University of Toledo (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Child Development and Digital Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Academic Assessments and iPads: Performance of Students from a Low Performing Urban Elementary School — Kathleen B. Aspiranti, Erin E. C. Henze, et al. · Contemporary School Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS