Shadow-boxing: Major gaps to knock out in bird–window interaction research

ABSTRACT Bird–window collisions are a leading source of bird mortality worldwide, estimated to kill as many as 1 billion birds annually in the U.S. alone. Though researchers have examined the factors contributing to general bird–window collisions, shadow-boxing, a nonfatal but potentially ecologically significant bird–window interaction, has primarily been excluded from the conversation. Shadow-boxing occurs when birds attack their reflection in human-made surfaces believing the reflection to be another individual intruding on their territory. Current bird–window interaction research often does not consider the unique drivers, impacts, and mitigation strategies associated with shadow-boxing. In this paper, we identify 5 major knowledge gaps: (1) building and environmental characteristics that lead to shadow-boxing; (2) the impacts on individual birds, (3) populations, and (4) people; and (5) the effectiveness of existing mitigation strategies for shadow-boxing. For each knowledge gap, we list research questions that will further our understanding of the scale and significance of shadow-boxing.