Willingness to Pay for Nature Protection: Crowdfunding as a Payment Mechanism

Abstract In this study, we use a discrete choice experiment to elicit the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for preventing and mitigating the effects of oil spills on marine and coastal ecosystem services, along a particularly vulnerable coastal region of mainland Portugal. We used a split-sample design to analyze the differences between two payment vehicles (PV): a mandatory extra income tax and a voluntary contribution collected by a crowdfunding campaign with a provision point mechanism and a money-back guarantee. The difference between the two PVs is examined in a setting where the local population has a negative perception of the quality of institutions. We find that respondents are more willing to contribute when presented with the crowdfunding version. Also, regardless of the payment vehicle, respondents who express a mistrust in institutions are more likely to choose the status quo. These results suggest the potential of using crowdfunding to support ecosystem services’ conservation initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Resource Economics
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00933-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sharing Economy and Platforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Willingness to Pay for Nature Protection: Crowdfunding as a Payment Mechanism

Maria A. Cunha‐e‐Sá, Margarida Ortigão, Til Dietrich, Luís C. Nunes et al.
2 citations
Environmental and Resource Economics
Sharing Economy and Platforms
0.88
article

Willingness to Pay for Nature Protection: Crowdfunding as a Payment Mechanism

Maria A. Cunha‐e‐Sá, Margarida Ortigão, Til Dietrich, Luís C. Nunes, Ana Cristina de Faria, Renato Moreira Rosa, Carina Vieira-da-Silva
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we use a discrete choice experiment to elicit the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for preventing and mitigating the effects of oil spills on marine and coastal ecosystem services, along a particularly vulnerable coastal region of mainland Portugal. We used a split-sample design to analyze the differences between two payment vehicles (PV): a mandatory extra income tax and a voluntary contribution collected by a crowdfunding campaign with a provision point mechanism and a money-back guarantee. The difference between the two PVs is examined in a setting where the local population has a negative perception of the quality of institutions. We find that respondents are more willing to contribute when presented with the crowdfunding version. Also, regardless of the payment vehicle, respondents who express a mistrust in institutions are more likely to choose the status quo. These results suggest the potential of using crowdfunding to support ecosystem services’ conservation initiatives.

Environmental and Resource EconomicsVol. 88(2)
University of Lisbon (PT), University of Coimbra (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Sharing Economy and Platforms
0.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.