Performance evaluation of cyclone models for similar body diameter and flowrate using CFD

Abstract The present study performs numerical simulations of a few popular medium-to-high efficiency cyclone models viz. Stairmand cyclone, Swift cyclone, Patterson-Munz cyclone, Obermair cyclone, and Lapple cyclone to compare their performance. The reason to undertake this study is that these models are widely used for benchmark studies or for the validation by the researchers. Earlier, all these geometries were investigated experimentally by respective inventors that bear different sizes. Hence, for the sake of performance comparison, the diameter ( D = 0.29 m) and a volume flow rate ( Q = 0.135401 m 3 /s) of the fluid in all the models is the same - the latter is used to calculate the inlet velocity in each cyclone model. We have not considered a similar Reynolds number condition for comparison as it will change the volume flow rate of the flow. Apart from the pressure drop and collection efficiency values, we present the details of the flow field inside each model. Conclusive results indicate that the Patterson-Munz cyclone has the lowest pressure drop while the Swift cyclone has the highest collection efficiency. Interestingly, the cut-off diameter in the swift cyclone is found to be minimum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics Conference Series
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2856/1/012003
Primary Topic
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance evaluation of cyclone models for similar body diameter and flowrate using CFD

Lakhbir Singh Brar, Satyanand Pandey, Om Prakash, Manoj Kumar et al.
Journal of Physics Conference Series
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
article

Performance evaluation of cyclone models for similar body diameter and flowrate using CFD

Lakhbir Singh Brar, Satyanand Pandey, Om Prakash, Manoj Kumar, Satyendra Singh
article en

Abstract

Abstract The present study performs numerical simulations of a few popular medium-to-high efficiency cyclone models viz. Stairmand cyclone, Swift cyclone, Patterson-Munz cyclone, Obermair cyclone, and Lapple cyclone to compare their performance. The reason to undertake this study is that these models are widely used for benchmark studies or for the validation by the researchers. Earlier, all these geometries were investigated experimentally by respective inventors that bear different sizes. Hence, for the sake of performance comparison, the diameter ( D = 0.29 m) and a volume flow rate ( Q = 0.135401 m 3 /s) of the fluid in all the models is the same - the latter is used to calculate the inlet velocity in each cyclone model. We have not considered a similar Reynolds number condition for comparison as it will change the volume flow rate of the flow. Apart from the pressure drop and collection efficiency values, we present the details of the flow field inside each model. Conclusive results indicate that the Patterson-Munz cyclone has the lowest pressure drop while the Swift cyclone has the highest collection efficiency. Interestingly, the cut-off diameter in the swift cyclone is found to be minimum.

Journal of Physics Conference SeriesVol. 2856(1)
Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra (IN), Indian Institute of Natural Resins and Gums (IN), Indian Institute of Management Ranchi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance evaluation of cyclone models for similar body diameter and flowrate using CFD — Lakhbir Singh Brar, Satyanand Pandey, et al. · Journal of Physics Conference Series (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS