From Empirical Problem-Solving to Theoretical Problem-Finding Perspectives on the Cognitive Sciences

Abstract Meta-theoretical perspectives on the research problems and activities of (cognitive) scientists often emphasize empirical problems and problem-solving as the main aspects that account for scientific progress. While certainly useful to shed light on issues of theory-observation relationships, these conceptual analyses typically begin when empirical problems are already there for researchers to solve. As a result, the role of theoretical problems and problem-finding remain comparatively obscure. How do the scientific problems of Cognitive Science arise, and what do they comprise, empirically and theoretically? Here, we attempt to understand the research activities that lead to adequate explanations through a broader conception of the problems researchers must attend to and how they come about. To this end, we bring theoretical problems and problem-finding out of obscurity to paint a more integrative picture of how these complement empirical problems and problem-solving to advance cognitive science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Brain & Behavior
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-024-00216-6
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Language and cultural evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Empirical Problem-Solving to Theoretical Problem-Finding Perspectives on the Cognitive Sciences

Federico Adolfi, Marieke Woensdregt, Laura van de Braak
4 citations
Computational Brain & Behavior
Language and cultural evolution
17.16
article

From Empirical Problem-Solving to Theoretical Problem-Finding Perspectives on the Cognitive Sciences

Federico Adolfi, Marieke Woensdregt, Laura van de Braak
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Meta-theoretical perspectives on the research problems and activities of (cognitive) scientists often emphasize empirical problems and problem-solving as the main aspects that account for scientific progress. While certainly useful to shed light on issues of theory-observation relationships, these conceptual analyses typically begin when empirical problems are already there for researchers to solve. As a result, the role of theoretical problems and problem-finding remain comparatively obscure. How do the scientific problems of Cognitive Science arise, and what do they comprise, empirically and theoretically? Here, we attempt to understand the research activities that lead to adequate explanations through a broader conception of the problems researchers must attend to and how they come about. To this end, we bring theoretical problems and problem-finding out of obscurity to paint a more integrative picture of how these complement empirical problems and problem-solving to advance cognitive science.

Computational Brain & BehaviorVol. 7(4)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Bristol (GB), Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL), Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Language and cultural evolution
17.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.