Comparative assessment of the scientific structure of biomass-based hydrogen from a cross-domain perspective

Abstract Biomass-based hydrogen production is an innovative approach for realizing carbon-neutral energy solutions. Despite their promise, both structures differ in terms of the biomass energy domain, which is at the entry point of the technology, and the hydrogen energy domain, which is at the exit point of the technology. In this study, we conducted structural and predictive analyses via cross-domain bibliometric analysis to clarify the differences in the structures and perspectives of researchers across domains and to suggest ways to strengthen collaboration to promote innovation. Our study revealed that the hydrogen energy domain has a balanced impact on realizing a hydrogen society using biomass-based hydrogen production technology, while the biomass energy domain has a strong interest in the process of processing biomass. The results reveal that different communities have different ideas about research, resulting in a divide in the areas to be achieved. This comparative analysis reveals the importance of synergistic progress through interdisciplinary efforts. By filling these gaps, our findings can lead to the development of a roadmap for future research and policy development in renewable energy and highlight the importance of a unified approach to sustainable hydrogen production. The contribution of this study is to provide evidence for the importance of cross-disciplinary cooperation for R&D directors and policy makers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Informatics
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-024-00399-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of the scientific structure of biomass-based hydrogen from a cross-domain perspective

Hajime Sasaki, Kunihiko Okuda
1 citations
Energy Informatics
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.10
article

Comparative assessment of the scientific structure of biomass-based hydrogen from a cross-domain perspective

Hajime Sasaki, Kunihiko Okuda
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Biomass-based hydrogen production is an innovative approach for realizing carbon-neutral energy solutions. Despite their promise, both structures differ in terms of the biomass energy domain, which is at the entry point of the technology, and the hydrogen energy domain, which is at the exit point of the technology. In this study, we conducted structural and predictive analyses via cross-domain bibliometric analysis to clarify the differences in the structures and perspectives of researchers across domains and to suggest ways to strengthen collaboration to promote innovation. Our study revealed that the hydrogen energy domain has a balanced impact on realizing a hydrogen society using biomass-based hydrogen production technology, while the biomass energy domain has a strong interest in the process of processing biomass. The results reveal that different communities have different ideas about research, resulting in a divide in the areas to be achieved. This comparative analysis reveals the importance of synergistic progress through interdisciplinary efforts. By filling these gaps, our findings can lead to the development of a roadmap for future research and policy development in renewable energy and highlight the importance of a unified approach to sustainable hydrogen production. The contribution of this study is to provide evidence for the importance of cross-disciplinary cooperation for R&D directors and policy makers.

Energy InformaticsVol. 7(1)
Panasonic (Japan) (JP), Bunkyo University (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.