Comparative Study of Single-Trait and Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction Models

Conventional genomic selection models trait individually, neglecting complex trait interactions. Multi-trait models address this by considering genetic correlations, thus improving breeding value accuracy. Despite their theoretical benefits, quantifying these models' breeding advantages across genetic backgrounds is essential. This study evaluates the benefits of multi-trait models under varying population sizes and three levels of genetic correlations (low, medium, high) using simulations based on 50 K chip data from 5000 individuals. In equal heritability scenarios, the multi-trait GBLUP model consistently outperforms single-trait models, with breeding advantages increasing with heritability. For example, with a reference population of 4500, improvements range from 0.3% to 4.1%. Notably, trait combinations with low heritability are insensitive to changes in genetic correlation, with gains remaining ≤ 0.1% across different genetic correlations under low heritability conditions. In differing heritability scenarios, the multi-trait model's benefits vary, particularly enhancing low-heritability traits when paired with high-heritability ones. Additionally, modeling time increases as genetic correlation decreases. The results of this study indicate that multi-trait models improve breeding accuracy but require more modeling time and place higher demands on algorithms and software. We recommend breeding strategies tailored to different phenotypes and genetic backgrounds to balance efficiency and accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14202961
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Single-Trait and Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction Models

Nengshui Ding, Shijun Xiao, Zhiyan Zhang, Xi Tang et al.
6 citations
Animals
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
3.30
article

Comparative Study of Single-Trait and Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction Models

Nengshui Ding, Shijun Xiao, Zhiyan Zhang, Xi Tang, Lusheng Huang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Conventional genomic selection models trait individually, neglecting complex trait interactions. Multi-trait models address this by considering genetic correlations, thus improving breeding value accuracy. Despite their theoretical benefits, quantifying these models' breeding advantages across genetic backgrounds is essential. This study evaluates the benefits of multi-trait models under varying population sizes and three levels of genetic correlations (low, medium, high) using simulations based on 50 K chip data from 5000 individuals. In equal heritability scenarios, the multi-trait GBLUP model consistently outperforms single-trait models, with breeding advantages increasing with heritability. For example, with a reference population of 4500, improvements range from 0.3% to 4.1%. Notably, trait combinations with low heritability are insensitive to changes in genetic correlation, with gains remaining ≤ 0.1% across different genetic correlations under low heritability conditions. In differing heritability scenarios, the multi-trait model's benefits vary, particularly enhancing low-heritability traits when paired with high-heritability ones. Additionally, modeling time increases as genetic correlation decreases. The results of this study indicate that multi-trait models improve breeding accuracy but require more modeling time and place higher demands on algorithms and software. We recommend breeding strategies tailored to different phenotypes and genetic backgrounds to balance efficiency and accuracy.

AnimalsVol. 14(20)
Jiangxi Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
3.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.