Magnetic Sensors for Magnetic Communication: A Comparison Between Giant Magneto-Impedance (GMI) and Induction-Based Sensors

This article presents a comparison between a digital high-sensitivity magneto-impedance giant magneto-impedance (GMI) sensor and typical induction-based magnetic sensors designed for magnetic communication. The system architecture of the GMI sensor is presented. Two configurations of induction sensors are considered and compared with the GMI sensor. The chosen performance indicators are the size of the sensing element, the working frequency of the magnetic communication system, the sensitivity, and the equivalent magnetic noise spectral density (EMNSD). Furthermore, with a given transmitter, the allowed transmission range is calculated and compared. The calculation and measurement results indicate that the GMI sensor, given its potential for improvement, could be more competitive in measuring low-frequency magnetic fields (involved in magnetic communication), especially in situations where the small size and weight of the receiver are of importance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2024.3480695
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetic Sensors for Magnetic Communication: A Comparison Between Giant Magneto-Impedance (GMI) and Induction-Based Sensors

Aktham Asfour, Papa Silly Traoré, Miao Xu
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
0.42
article

Magnetic Sensors for Magnetic Communication: A Comparison Between Giant Magneto-Impedance (GMI) and Induction-Based Sensors

Aktham Asfour, Papa Silly Traoré, Miao Xu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article presents a comparison between a digital high-sensitivity magneto-impedance giant magneto-impedance (GMI) sensor and typical induction-based magnetic sensors designed for magnetic communication. The system architecture of the GMI sensor is presented. Two configurations of induction sensors are considered and compared with the GMI sensor. The chosen performance indicators are the size of the sensing element, the working frequency of the magnetic communication system, the sensitivity, and the equivalent magnetic noise spectral density (EMNSD). Furthermore, with a given transmitter, the allowed transmission range is calculated and compared. The calculation and measurement results indicate that the GMI sensor, given its potential for improvement, could be more competitive in measuring low-frequency magnetic fields (involved in magnetic communication), especially in situations where the small size and weight of the receiver are of importance.

IEEE Transactions on MagneticsVol. 61(6)
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Cheikh Anta Diop University (SN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.