Electron Beam Dosimetry for Space Solar Cell Radiation Qualifications

The implications of common dosimetry methods used in electron beam irradiations for the space qualification of photovoltaics are described. The maximum power degradation of advanced solar cell technologies is compared as a function of electron fluence obtained from two electron irradiation facilities. The significant difference in the degradation rates between the two facilities suggests a systematic error in the electron fluence. The difference in dosimetry is examined using MCNP6.2 Monte Carlo simulations for ionizing and displacement damage dose (DDD) depositions along the electron beam path for each facility. It is shown that the 1-MeV electron beam flux, as determined from ionizing dosimetry methods, is overestimated by >24% compared to a nonionizing dosimetry counterpart. The error results from not properly accounting for the degradation of the electron beam energy and flux through the beam window and air gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tns.2024.3480812
Primary Topic
solar cell performance optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electron Beam Dosimetry for Space Solar Cell Radiation Qualifications

Jeffrey H. Warner, S.C. Witczak, Scott R. Messenger
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
solar cell performance optimization
article

Electron Beam Dosimetry for Space Solar Cell Radiation Qualifications

Jeffrey H. Warner, S.C. Witczak, Scott R. Messenger
article en

Abstract

The implications of common dosimetry methods used in electron beam irradiations for the space qualification of photovoltaics are described. The maximum power degradation of advanced solar cell technologies is compared as a function of electron fluence obtained from two electron irradiation facilities. The significant difference in the degradation rates between the two facilities suggests a systematic error in the electron fluence. The difference in dosimetry is examined using MCNP6.2 Monte Carlo simulations for ionizing and displacement damage dose (DDD) depositions along the electron beam path for each facility. It is shown that the 1-MeV electron beam flux, as determined from ionizing dosimetry methods, is overestimated by >24% compared to a nonionizing dosimetry counterpart. The error results from not properly accounting for the degradation of the electron beam energy and flux through the beam window and air gap.

IEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceVol. 72(4)
Northrop Grumman (United States) (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
solar cell performance optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Electron Beam Dosimetry for Space Solar Cell Radiation Qualifications — Jeffrey H. Warner, S.C. Witczak, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS